Literature DB >> 17346494

Maternal decisions regarding prenatal diagnosis: rational choices or sensible decisions?

Karen L Lawson1, Roger A Pierson2.   

Abstract

The premise underlying prenatal testing is that knowing the health status of the fetus will enable expectant parents to make rational reproductive decisions. Accordingly, rational-choice perspectives have informed both counselling protocols and the majority of investigations into the psychological processes involved in making decisions about testing and selective abortion. However, because conditions inherent in the testing situation may not adhere to the basic assumptions of rational choice models, the use of these models may be inappropriate. The individualistic focus of rational choice models may be too narrow to encompass the social and psychological factors relevant to making a decision about testing. In light of these limitations, we make a case for adopting a contextual framework for conceptualizing decisions regarding the use of prenatal testing.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17346494      PMCID: PMC2896965          DOI: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)32412-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can        ISSN: 1701-2163


  23 in total

1.  The psychodynamic significance of beliefs regarding the cause of serious illness.

Authors:  M BARD; R B DYK
Journal:  Psychoanal Rev       Date:  1956-04

2.  Evaluation of the Health Belief Model and decision making regarding amniocentesis in women of advanced maternal age.

Authors:  B N French; T W Kurczynski; M T Weaver; M J Pituch
Journal:  Health Educ Q       Date:  1992

3.  Maternity care and maternal serum screening. Do male and female family physicians care for women differently?

Authors:  C A Woodward; J C Carroll; G Ryan; A J Reid; J A Permaul-Woods; S Arbitman; S B Domb; B Fallis; J Kilthei
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Staff attitudes towards patients: the influence of causal attributions for illness.

Authors:  T M Marteau; D C Riordan
Journal:  Br J Clin Psychol       Date:  1992-02

5.  Ontario Maternal Serum Screening Program: practices, knowledge and opinions of health care providers.

Authors:  J C Carroll; A J Reid; C A Woodward; J A Permaul-Woods; S Domb; G Ryan; S Arbitman; B Fallis; J Kilthei
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Maladaptive behavior in children with Prader-Willi syndrome, Down syndrome, and nonspecific mental retardation.

Authors:  E M Dykens; C Kasari
Journal:  Am J Ment Retard       Date:  1997-11

7.  Perception of burden among at-risk women of raising a child with fragile-X syndrome.

Authors:  D L Meryash
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 4.438

Review 8.  "Choice" as a double-edged sword: information, guilt and mother-blaming in a high-tech age.

Authors:  R Gregg
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  1993

Review 9.  Prenatal genetic testing and geneticization: mother matters for all.

Authors:  A Lippman
Journal:  Fetal Diagn Ther       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.587

10.  The impact of prenatal genetic testing on quality of life in women.

Authors:  E A Gates
Journal:  Fetal Diagn Ther       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.587

View more
  10 in total

1.  Women's preferences for and experiences with prenatal genetic testing decision making: Sociodemographic disparities in preference-concordant decision making.

Authors:  Fabiola Molina; Christine Dehlendorf; Steven E Gregorich; Miriam Kuppermann
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2018-10-29

2.  Impacts of variants of uncertain significance on parental perceptions of children after prenatal chromosome microarray testing.

Authors:  Preeya Desai; Hannah Haber; Jessica Bulafka; Amita Russell; Rebecca Clifton; Julia Zachary; Seonjoo Lee; Tianshu Feng; Ronald Wapner; Catherine Monk; Wendy K Chung
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 3.050

3.  Is advice incompatible with autonomous informed choice? Women's perceptions of advice in the context of antenatal screening: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Shenaz Ahmed; Louise D Bryant; Zahra Tizro; Darren Shickle
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Imagined futures: how experiential knowledge of disability affects parents' decision making about fetal abnormality.

Authors:  Emma F France; Louise Locock; Kate Hunt; Sue Ziebland; Kate Field; Sally Wyke
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-05-30       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Ultrasound's 'window on the womb' brings ethical challenges for balancing maternal and fetal health interests: obstetricians' experiences in Australia.

Authors:  Kristina Edvardsson; Rhonda Small; Ann Lalos; Margareta Persson; Ingrid Mogren
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 2.652

6.  Parental decision-making following a prenatal diagnosis that is lethal, life-limiting, or has long term implications for the future child and family: a meta-synthesis of qualitative literature.

Authors:  Claire Blakeley; Debbie M Smith; Edward D Johnstone; Anja Wittkowski
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 2.652

7.  The influence of experiential knowledge and societal perceptions on decision-making regarding non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT).

Authors:  Sophie Montgomery; Zaneta M Thayer
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  'It made you think twice' - an interview study of women's perception of a web-based decision aid concerning screening and diagnostic testing for fetal anomalies.

Authors:  Annika Åhman; Anna Sarkadi; Peter Lindgren; Christine Rubertsson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Two sides of the same coin--an interview study of Swedish obstetricians' experiences using ultrasound in pregnancy management.

Authors:  Annika Åhman; Margareta Persson; Kristina Edvardsson; Ann Lalos; Sophie Graner; Rhonda Small; Ingrid Mogren
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Facilitating autonomous, confident and satisfying choices: a mixed-method study of women's choice-making in prenatal screening for common aneuploidies.

Authors:  An Chen; Henni Tenhunen; Paulus Torkki; Antti Peltokorpi; Seppo Heinonen; Paul Lillrank; Vedran Stefanovic
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 3.007

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.