Literature DB >> 20509160

Invasive prenatal testing decisions in pregnancy after infertility.

Colleen Caleshu1, Shoshana Shiloh, Cristofer Price, Julie Sapp, Barbara Biesecker.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed decisional conflict about invasive prenatal testing among women pregnant after infertility.
METHODS: We surveyed 180 pregnant women with a history of infertility using a mixed methods cross-sectional design. Difficulty in deciding whether to have prenatal testing was measured using the Decisional Conflict Scale.
RESULTS: A minority of women (31%) chose to have invasive prenatal testing. Most participants (72%) reported low decisional conflict (score < 25; mean = 22.1; standard deviation = 23.2; range: 0-100). Half (53%) of the participants said that infertility made the testing decision easier. Qualitative data suggest that infertility makes the decision easier by clarifying relevant values and priorities. Most infertility characteristics studied were not significantly associated with decisional conflict. Variables associated with higher decisional conflict included infertility distress due to rejection of a childfree lifestyle, disagreement with others about testing, and choosing to have invasive testing after having had treatment for infertility.
CONCLUSIONS: For some women, infertility may make the invasive prenatal testing decision easier. Women with the greatest need for decisional support were those who have had treatment and choose invasive testing, who disagree with others about their testing choice, or who are particularly distressed about being childless.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20509160      PMCID: PMC3096436          DOI: 10.1002/pd.2529

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  36 in total

1.  Applying the theory of planned behavior to predict dairy product consumption by older adults.

Authors:  Kyungwon Kim; Marla Reicks; Sara Sjoberg
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.045

2.  Psychological responses to prenatal NTS counseling and the uptake of invasive testing in women of advanced maternal age.

Authors:  Amy S Kaiser; Lorraine E Ferris; Randy Katz; Anne Pastuszak; Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas; Jo-Ann Johnson; Brian F Shaw
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2004-07

3.  Amniocentesis in the context of infertility.

Authors:  M Sandelowski; B G Harris; D Holditch-Davis
Journal:  Health Care Women Int       Date:  1991 Apr-Jun

4.  Evaluation of the Health Belief Model and decision making regarding amniocentesis in women of advanced maternal age.

Authors:  B N French; T W Kurczynski; M T Weaver; M J Pituch
Journal:  Health Educ Q       Date:  1992

5.  Psychological status of in vitro fertilization patients during pregnancy: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  S C Klock; D A Greenfeld
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  A qualitative study of women's decision-making at the end of IVF treatment.

Authors:  V L Peddie; E van Teijlingen; S Bhattacharya
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2005-03-31       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Impaired fecundity in the United States: 1982-1995.

Authors:  A Chandra; E H Stephen
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb

8.  Personality factors and emotional responses to pregnancy among IVF couples in early pregnancy: a comparative study.

Authors:  Anna Hjelmstedt; Ann-Marie Widström; Håkan Wramsby; Ann-Sofi Matthiesen; Aila Collins
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.636

9.  Attitudes about genetic risk of couples undergoing in-vitro fertilization.

Authors:  L R Schover; A J Thomas; T Falcone; M Attaran; J Goldberg
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Spontaneous pregnancies in couples who discontinued intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment: a 5-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Kaan Osmanagaoglu; John Collins; Efstratios Kolibianakis; Herman Tournaye; Michel Camus; Andre Van Steirteghem; Paul Devroey
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  3 in total

1.  It's complicated - Factors predicting decisional conflict in prenatal diagnostic testing.

Authors:  Cécile Muller; Linda D Cameron
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Decisional conflict among couples seeking specialty treatment for infertility in the USA: a longitudinal exploratory study.

Authors:  R Anguzu; R Cusatis; N Fergestrom; A Cooper; K D Schoyer; J B Davis; J Sandlow; K E Flynn
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Congenital malformations and assisted reproductive technique: Where is assisted reproductive technique taking us?

Authors:  Sunita Tandulwadkar; Pooja Lodha; Vineeta Kharb
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2012-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.