Literature DB >> 16184395

What causes residual dual-task interference after practice?

Eric Ruthruff1, Eliot Hazeltine, Roger W Remington.   

Abstract

Practice can dramatically reduce dual-task interference, but typically does not eliminate interference entirely. Residual interference after practice is especially large with certain non-preferred modality pairings (e.g., auditory-manual and visual-vocal). Does this residual interference imply the existence of a persistent central-processing bottleneck? To address this question, we transferred participants with previous dual-task practice to a psychological refractory period design. Although we observed residual dual-task costs in all four experiments, there was no evidence for a bottleneck, even with non-preferred modality pairings. We conclude that practice can eliminate the bottleneck limitation, but performance is still subject to other sources of interference, such as competition between central codes of the two tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16184395     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-005-0012-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  21 in total

1.  Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: I. Semantic memory.

Authors:  G D Logan; M D Schulkind
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 2.  A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance.

Authors:  Michael Tombu; Pierre Jolicoeur
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Vanishing dual-task interference after practice: has the bottleneck been eliminated or is it merely latent?

Authors:  Eric Ruthruff; James C Johnston; Mark Van Selst; Shelly Whitsell; Roger Remington
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Dual-task interference with equal task emphasis: graded capacity sharing or central postponement?

Authors:  Eric Ruthruff; Harold E Pashler; Eliot Hazeltine
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2003-07

Review 5.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning.

Authors:  B Hommel; J Müsseler; G Aschersleben; W Prinz
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 12.579

Review 6.  Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: implications for response selection.

Authors:  Mei-Ching Lien; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-06

7.  The role of input and output modality pairings in dual-task performance: evidence for content-dependent central interference.

Authors:  Eliot Hazeltine; Eric Ruthruff; Roger W Remington
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Can practice eliminate the psychological refractory period effect?

Authors:  M Van Selst; E Ruthruff; J C Johnston
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  How does practice reduce dual-task interference: integration, automatization, or just stage-shortening?

Authors:  Eric Ruthruff; Mark Van Selst; James C Johnston; Roger Remington
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-11-17

Review 10.  A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms.

Authors:  D E Meyer; D E Kieras
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  14 in total

1.  Bypassing the central bottleneck after single-task practice in the psychological refractory period paradigm: evidence for task automatization and greedy resource recruitment.

Authors:  François Maquestiaux; Maude Laguë-Beauvais; Eric Ruthruff; Louis Bherer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-10

2.  Multitasking as a choice: a perspective.

Authors:  Laura Broeker; Roman Liepelt; Edita Poljac; Stefan Künzell; Harald Ewolds; Rita F de Oliveira; Markus Raab
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-10-30

3.  Neural sources of performance decline during continuous multitasking.

Authors:  Omar Al-Hashimi; Theodore P Zanto; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 4.027

4.  The role of input-output modality compatibility in task switching.

Authors:  Denise Nadine Stephan; Iring Koch
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-08-21

5.  Interference effects of stimulus-response modality pairings in dual tasks and their robustness.

Authors:  Christine Stelzel; Torsten Schubert
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-08-03

Review 6.  The role of saccades in multitasking: towards an output-related view of eye movements.

Authors:  Lynn Huestegge
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-07-01

7.  Investigating the modality specificity of response selection using a temporal flanker task.

Authors:  Eric H Schumacher; Hillary Schwarb; Erin Lightman; Eliot Hazeltine
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-08-28

8.  Emerging features of modality mappings in task switching: modality compatibility requires variability at the level of both stimulus and response modality.

Authors:  Edina Fintor; Denise N Stephan; Iring Koch
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-06-03

9.  Restricted transfer of learning between unimanual and bimanual finger sequences.

Authors:  Atsushi Yokoi; Wenjun Bai; Jörn Diedrichsen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  The source of dual-task limitations: serial or parallel processing of multiple response selections?

Authors:  Suk Won Han; René Marois
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.