Literature DB >> 21874548

Investigating the modality specificity of response selection using a temporal flanker task.

Eric H Schumacher1, Hillary Schwarb, Erin Lightman, Eliot Hazeltine.   

Abstract

The neurocognitive architecture for response selection is uncertain. Some theorists suggest that it is mediated by an amodal central mechanism, whereas others propose a set of independent control mechanisms. In a functional neuroimaging experiment, we investigated the nature of response selection by examining how its underlying brain mechanisms are affected by stimulus modality. To do this, we used a modified flanker task, in which the target and flanker (distractor) stimuli differed in time rather than space, making it accessible for both visual and auditory stimuli. As in the traditional flanker task, larger reaction times were observed for incongruent than congruent trials (i.e., a congruency effect) for both modalities. Congruency affected brain activation for both modalities in prefrontal cortex, parietal cortex, and the putamen. Modality-dependent activation was found in additional prefrontal and parietal regions for the visual modality and in left inferior prefrontal cortex for the auditory modality. Modality-dependent activity specifically related to response congruency was also found in sensory cortical regions. These data suggest that modality affects the brain regions throughout the cortex mediating response selection even for conceptually identical stimuli and tasks. They are consistent with the hypothesis that (at least partially) independent brain networks mediate response selection and that input modality may be a powerful factor for organizing neural activity to support task performance.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21874548     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-011-0369-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  46 in total

1.  Vanishing dual-task interference after practice: has the bottleneck been eliminated or is it merely latent?

Authors:  Eric Ruthruff; James C Johnston; Mark Van Selst; Shelly Whitsell; Roger Remington
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  The neural effect of stimulus-response modality compatibility on dual-task performance: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Christine Stelzel; Eric H Schumacher; Torsten Schubert; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-09-21

3.  Parallel response selection disrupts sequence learning under dual-task conditions.

Authors:  Eric H Schumacher; Hillary Schwarb
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2009-05

4.  A new brain region for coordinating speech articulation.

Authors:  N F Dronkers
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-11-14       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Multiple conflict-driven control mechanisms in the human brain.

Authors:  Tobias Egner
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Switching attention between modalities: further evidence for visual dominance.

Authors:  Sarah Lukas; Andrea M Philipp; Iring Koch
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-06-11

Review 7.  A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms.

Authors:  D E Meyer; D E Kieras
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Functional MRI investigation of verbal selection mechanisms in lateral prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Irene E Nagel; Eric H Schumacher; Rainer Goebel; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Parallel response selection after callosotomy.

Authors:  Eliot Hazeltine; Andrea Weinstein; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Material-dependent and material-independent selection processes in the frontal and parietal lobes: an event-related fMRI investigation of response competition.

Authors:  Eliot Hazeltine; Silvia A Bunge; Michael D Scanlon; John D E Gabrieli
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  8 in total

1.  The role of input-output modality compatibility in task switching.

Authors:  Denise Nadine Stephan; Iring Koch
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-08-21

2.  Involuntary strategy-dependent dual task performance.

Authors:  Moran Israel; Asher Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-07-07

3.  Interference effects of stimulus-response modality pairings in dual tasks and their robustness.

Authors:  Christine Stelzel; Torsten Schubert
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-08-03

4.  Talking and driving: applications of crossmodal action reveal a special role for spatial language.

Authors:  Paul Atchley; Jeff Dressel; Todd C Jones; Rebecca A Burson; David Marshall
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-06-28

5.  Crossmodal action: modality matters.

Authors:  Lynn Huestegge; Eliot Hazeltine
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-11

6.  Analyzing distributional properties of interference effects across modalities: chances and challenges.

Authors:  Kerstin Dittrich; David Kellen; Christoph Stahl
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-03-14

7.  Action errors impair active working memory maintenance.

Authors:  Jan R Wessel; Jiefeng Jiang; Jeff J Stolley
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2022-02-10

8.  Amodal processing in human prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Benjamin J Tamber-Rosenau; Paul E Dux; Michael N Tombu; Christopher L Asplund; René Marois
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 6.167

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.