Literature DB >> 21858664

The role of input-output modality compatibility in task switching.

Denise Nadine Stephan1, Iring Koch.   

Abstract

Input-output (I-O) modality compatibility refers to the similarity of stimulus modality and modality of response-related sensory consequences. A previous study found higher switch costs in task switching in I-O modality incompatible tasks (auditory-manual and visual-vocal) than in I-O modality compatible tasks (auditory-vocal and visual-manual). However, these tasks had spatially compatible S-R mappings, which implied dimensional overlap (DO). DO may have led to automatic activation of the corresponding compatible responses in the incorrect response modality, thus increasing interference effects. The present study was aimed to examine the influence of DO on I-O modality compatibility effects. In two experiments, we found that I-O modality compatibility affects task switching even in tasks without DO, which even tended to result in further increased modality influences. This finding suggests that I-O modality mappings affect response selection by affecting between-task cross-talk not on the level of specific response codes but on the level of modality-specific processing pathways.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21858664     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-011-0353-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  24 in total

1.  Modeling cognitive control in task-switching.

Authors:  N Meiran
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2000

2.  The dissipating task-repetition benefit in cued task switching: task-set decay or temporal distinctiveness?

Authors:  Himeh Horoufchin; Andrea M Philipp; Iring Koch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 3.  A review of contemporary ideomotor theory.

Authors:  Yun Kyoung Shin; Robert W Proctor; E J Capaldi
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  The neural effect of stimulus-response modality compatibility on dual-task performance: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Christine Stelzel; Eric H Schumacher; Torsten Schubert; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-09-21

5.  The role of input and output modality pairings in dual-task performance: evidence for content-dependent central interference.

Authors:  Eliot Hazeltine; Eric Ruthruff; Roger W Remington
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Switching attention between modalities: further evidence for visual dominance.

Authors:  Sarah Lukas; Andrea M Philipp; Iring Koch
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-06-11

7.  Interference effects of stimulus-response modality pairings in dual tasks and their robustness.

Authors:  Christine Stelzel; Torsten Schubert
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-08-03

8.  Investigating the modality specificity of response selection using a temporal flanker task.

Authors:  Eric H Schumacher; Hillary Schwarb; Erin Lightman; Eliot Hazeltine
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-08-28

9.  Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: with special reference to the ideo-motor mechanism.

Authors:  A G Greenwald
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 10.  A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms.

Authors:  D E Meyer; D E Kieras
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  21 in total

1.  Modality-specific effects on crosstalk in task switching: evidence from modality compatibility using bimodal stimulation.

Authors:  Denise Nadine Stephan; Iring Koch
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-09-16

2.  Involuntary strategy-dependent dual task performance.

Authors:  Moran Israel; Asher Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-07-07

3.  Interference effects of stimulus-response modality pairings in dual tasks and their robustness.

Authors:  Christine Stelzel; Torsten Schubert
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-08-03

4.  Talking and driving: applications of crossmodal action reveal a special role for spatial language.

Authors:  Paul Atchley; Jeff Dressel; Todd C Jones; Rebecca A Burson; David Marshall
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-06-28

5.  Crossmodal action: modality matters.

Authors:  Lynn Huestegge; Eliot Hazeltine
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-11

6.  The role of sensory-motor modality compatibility in language processing.

Authors:  Simone Schaeffner; Iring Koch; Andrea M Philipp
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-03-27

7.  Components of competitor priming in task switching.

Authors:  Morgan L Teskey; Michael E J Masson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-11

8.  The role of learning in sensory-motor modality switching.

Authors:  Simone Schaeffner; Iring Koch; Andrea M Philipp
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-05-24

9.  Emerging features of modality mappings in task switching: modality compatibility requires variability at the level of both stimulus and response modality.

Authors:  Edina Fintor; Denise N Stephan; Iring Koch
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-06-03

10.  Modality compatibility biases voluntary choice of response modality in task switching.

Authors:  Edina Fintor; Edita Poljac; Denise N Stephan; Iring Koch
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-06-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.