PURPOSE: The high mortality associated with esophageal perforation can be reduced by aggressive surgery and good critical care. We report our experience of treating esophageal perforation in a clinic in Taiwan. METHODS: The subjects were 28 patients who underwent surgery for a benign esophageal perforation. RESULTS: The esophageal perforation was iatrogenic in 11 patients, spontaneous in 8, and caused by foreign body injury in 9. Most (22/28) of the patients were seen longer than 24 h after perforation, and 77% had empyema preoperatively. The perforation was located in the cervical area in 5 patients and in the thoracic esophagus in 23. We performed primary repair in 24 patients, esophagectomy in 3, and drainage in 1. Leakage occurred after primary repair in ten (41%) patients, resulting in one death, and two patients died of other diseases. Postoperative leakage prolonged the hospital stay but had no impact on mortality. Overall survival was 90%. Univariate analysis revealed that age, timing of treatment, and cause and location of the perforation influenced outcome, but multivariate analysis failed to identify a predictor of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Early diagnosis and intervention are crucial to prevent morbidity and mortality in patients with esophageal perforation. Primary repair is feasible even if the diagnosis is delayed.
PURPOSE: The high mortality associated with esophageal perforation can be reduced by aggressive surgery and good critical care. We report our experience of treating esophageal perforation in a clinic in Taiwan. METHODS: The subjects were 28 patients who underwent surgery for a benign esophageal perforation. RESULTS: The esophageal perforation was iatrogenic in 11 patients, spontaneous in 8, and caused by foreign body injury in 9. Most (22/28) of the patients were seen longer than 24 h after perforation, and 77% had empyema preoperatively. The perforation was located in the cervical area in 5 patients and in the thoracic esophagus in 23. We performed primary repair in 24 patients, esophagectomy in 3, and drainage in 1. Leakage occurred after primary repair in ten (41%) patients, resulting in one death, and two patients died of other diseases. Postoperative leakage prolonged the hospital stay but had no impact on mortality. Overall survival was 90%. Univariate analysis revealed that age, timing of treatment, and cause and location of the perforation influenced outcome, but multivariate analysis failed to identify a predictor of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Early diagnosis and intervention are crucial to prevent morbidity and mortality in patients with esophageal perforation. Primary repair is feasible even if the diagnosis is delayed.
Authors: Joseph B Shrager; John C Wain; Cameron D Wright; Dean M Donahue; Gus J Vlahakes; Ashby C Moncure; Hermes C Grillo; Douglas J Mathisen Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Jeffrey L Port; Michael S Kent; Robert J Korst; Matthew Bacchetta; Nasser K Altorki Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: N Wang; A J Razzouk; A Safavi; K Gan; G S Van Arsdell; P M Burton; B L Fandrich; M J Wood; A C Hill; E E Vyhmeister; R Miranda; C Ahn; S R Gundry Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 1996-01 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: J A Salo; J O Isolauri; L J Heikkilä; H T Markkula; L O Heikkinen; E O Kivilaakso; S P Mattila Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 1993-12 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Andrej Udelnow; Markus Huber-Lang; Markus Juchems; Karl Träger; Doris Henne-Bruns; Peter Würl Journal: World J Surg Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 3.352