OBJECTIVE: The diagnosis and management of oesophageal perforation continues to challenge clinicians. We present our experience of perforated oesophagus in a Tertiary Referral Centre for Thoracic and Oesophageal Surgery. METHODS: Between 1985 and 2000, 75 patients (40 male) with oesophageal perforation were treated in out unit; age range 24-89, median 63. Retrospective review of these cases has been performed. RESULTS: There were 12 deaths (16%). With increases in time from perforation to diagnosis, there was a stepwise increase in the mortality rate. Immediate diagnosis 5%; early diagnosis (1-24h) 14%; late diagnosis (>24h) 44% (P>or=0.002). Site of perforation, aetiology, and treatment strategy had no influence on mortality. The only independent predictor of mortality identified was time to diagnosis from perforation (beta 0.429, P=0.001). Time to definitive management in those undergoing an operative procedure had no influence on outcome with multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Prompt recognition of the diagnosis of oesophageal perforation and rapid institution of supportive measures, followed by an appropriate, patient specific treatment option optimises the chance of a successful outcome. The wide range of presentation of oesophageal perforation necessitates individualisation of treatment.
OBJECTIVE: The diagnosis and management of oesophageal perforation continues to challenge clinicians. We present our experience of perforated oesophagus in a Tertiary Referral Centre for Thoracic and Oesophageal Surgery. METHODS: Between 1985 and 2000, 75 patients (40 male) with oesophageal perforation were treated in out unit; age range 24-89, median 63. Retrospective review of these cases has been performed. RESULTS: There were 12 deaths (16%). With increases in time from perforation to diagnosis, there was a stepwise increase in the mortality rate. Immediate diagnosis 5%; early diagnosis (1-24h) 14%; late diagnosis (>24h) 44% (P>or=0.002). Site of perforation, aetiology, and treatment strategy had no influence on mortality. The only independent predictor of mortality identified was time to diagnosis from perforation (beta 0.429, P=0.001). Time to definitive management in those undergoing an operative procedure had no influence on outcome with multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Prompt recognition of the diagnosis of oesophageal perforation and rapid institution of supportive measures, followed by an appropriate, patient specific treatment option optimises the chance of a successful outcome. The wide range of presentation of oesophageal perforation necessitates individualisation of treatment.
Authors: Ahmet Sami Bayram; Mehmet Muharrem Erol; Huseyin Melek; Mehmet Ali Colak; Tayfun Kermenli; Cengiz Gebitekin Journal: Eurasian J Med Date: 2014-12-05
Authors: Jessica M Leers; Carlo Vivaldi; Hartmut Schäfer; Marc Bludau; Jan Brabender; Georg Lurje; Till Herbold; Arnulf H Hölscher; Ralf Metzger Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2009-01-28 Impact factor: 4.584