Literature DB >> 8246543

Management of delayed esophageal perforation with mediastinal sepsis. Esophagectomy or primary repair?

J A Salo1, J O Isolauri, L J Heikkilä, H T Markkula, L O Heikkinen, E O Kivilaakso, S P Mattila.   

Abstract

Ninety patients with esophageal perforations were operated on at our institutions between 1970 and 1992. Thirty-four of them were seen after delayed diagnosis (> 24 hours) with mediastinal sepsis caused by perforation of the thoracic esophagus. There were 18 patients with spontaneous ruptures, 11 with instrumental perforations (including one caused during laparotomy), and 3 perforations caused by foreign bodies. One patient had perforation of an esophageal ulcer into the pericardium and another had perforation of an esophageal diverticulum into the mediastinum. Nineteen patients underwent primary repair of the perforation with cleansing and drainage of the mediastinum and the pleural cavity. The remaining 15 had primary extirpation of the thoracic esophagus, irrigation of the mediastinum with antibiotics, cervical esophagostomy, gastrostomy, and drainage of the mediastinum and pleural cavity. Nineteen of the 34 patients survived (hospital mortality 44%). Of patients with primary repair, only six survived (in-hospital mortality 68%), whereas only two patients treated with esophagectomy died (in-hospital mortality 13%). The difference was highly significant (p = 0.001). The most common cause of death was multiorgan failure resulting from sepsis. Postoperative complications developed in four patients treated with primary repair (two sepsis, one empyema, and one anuria) and in seven patients treated with esophagectomy (two empyema, two sepsis, one pneumonia, one mediastinal abscess, and one brain abscess). After healing of the mediastinitis, the esophagogastric continuity was reconstructed with colon in 11 patients and stomach in two patients. In the management of delayed esophageal perforation with mediastinal sepsis, esophagectomy is superior to primary repair alone, which often leads to mediastinal leakage, continued sepsis, and death.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8246543

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  24 in total

1.  Management of esophageal perforations.

Authors:  Sven Christian Schmidt; Stefan Strauch; Thomas Rösch; Wilfried Veltzke-Schlieker; Sven Jonas; Johann Pratschke; Henning Weidemann; Peter Neuhaus; Guido Schumacher
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Successful application of an omental pedicle flap in delayed repair of a perforated esophageal diverticulum: report of a case.

Authors:  T Oka; N Yamaoka; H Taniguchi; T Hisamatsu; Y Uchiyama
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Treatment of esophageal perforation in a referral center in taiwan.

Authors:  Yin-Kai Chao; Yun-Hen Liu; Po-Jen Ko; Yi-Cheng Wu; Ming-Ju Hsieh; Hui-Ping Liu; Pyng Jing Lin
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Esophageal perforation in adults: aggressive, conservative treatment lowers morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  Stephen B Vogel; W Robert Rout; Tomas D Martin; Patricia L Abbitt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Iatrogenic esophageal injuries: evidence-based management for diagnosis and timing of contrast studies after repair.

Authors:  Ellen Ko; A H O-Yurvati
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2012 Jan-Mar

6.  Boerhaave's syndrome: diagnosis and successful primary repair one month after the oesophageal perforation.

Authors:  M N Tamatey; L A Sereboe; M M Tettey; K Entsua-Mensah; B Gyan
Journal:  Ghana Med J       Date:  2013-03

7.  [Management of iatrogenic esophageal perforations].

Authors:  J Lautermann; K Radecke; H Sudhoff; H Lang; A Neumann; K Jahnke; T Zöpf
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  Perforation of esophagus and subsequent mediastinitis following mussel shell ingestion.

Authors:  Il Hwan Park; Hyun Kyo Lim; Seung Woo Song; Kwang Ho Lee
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Management of esophageal perforation and anastomotic leak by transluminal drainage.

Authors:  Robert N Williams; Andrew W Hall; Christopher D Sutton; Sukhbir S Ubhi; David J Bowrey
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Esophageal perforation in South of Sweden: results of surgical treatment in 125 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Michael Hermansson; Jan Johansson; Tomas Gudbjartsson; Göran Hambreus; Per Jönsson; Ramon Lillo-Gil; Ulrika Smedh; Thomas Zilling
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.