Literature DB >> 12444991

Surgery in thoracic esophageal perforation: primary repair is feasible.

S W Sung1, J-J Park, Y T Kim, J H Kim.   

Abstract

Prompt diagnosis and effective treatment are important for thoracic esophageal perforations. The decision for proper management is difficult especially when diagnosed late. However, there is an increasing consensus that primary repair provides good results for repair of thoracic esophageal perforations, which are not diagnosed on time. Primary repair for thoracic esophageal perforations was applied in 20 out of 25 consecutive patients. The time interval between perforation and repair was less than 24 h in six patients (group I), and more than 24 h in 14 patients (group II). The remaining five patients underwent esophagectomy with simultaneous or staged reconstruction because of incorrectable underlying esophageal pathology. Group I had much more iatrogenic causes (P < 0.05). Preoperative sepsis occurred only in group II (P=0.05) and was highly associated with Boerhaave syndrome (P=0.001). Regional viable tissue was used to reinforce the sites of primary repair (n=15, 75%). All of the postoperative morbidity (n=9, 45%) including esophageal leaks (n=6, 30%) and operative death (n=1, 5%) occurred in group II. In patients with postoperative leaks, five eventually healed, but one became a fistula that required reoperation. Primary healing with preservation of the native esophagus was achieved in all 19 patients except one operative death. In addition, the increased incidence of leak and morbidity did not lead to an increase in mortality. In the esophagectomy group, there was no mortality, but one minor suture leak. Regardless of the time interval between the injury and the operation, primary repair is recommended for non-malignant, thoracic, esophageal perforations, but not for anastomotic leaks. Reinforcement that may change the nature of a possible leak is also useful. For incorrectable underlying esophageal pathology, esophagectomy with simultaneous or staged reconstruction is indicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12444991     DOI: 10.1046/j.1442-2050.2002.00251.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  24 in total

1.  Treatment of esophageal perforation in a referral center in taiwan.

Authors:  Yin-Kai Chao; Yun-Hen Liu; Po-Jen Ko; Yi-Cheng Wu; Ming-Ju Hsieh; Hui-Ping Liu; Pyng Jing Lin
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Barogenic esophageal rupture: Boerhaave syndrome.

Authors:  Calvin S H Ng; Wilfred L M Mui; Anthony P C Yim
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Perforations of the esophagus and stomach: what should I do?

Authors:  Francesca Dimou; Vic Velanovich
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  The success of surgery in the first 24 hours in patients with esophageal perforation.

Authors:  Ahmet Sami Bayram; Mehmet Muharrem Erol; Huseyin Melek; Mehmet Ali Colak; Tayfun Kermenli; Cengiz Gebitekin
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2014-12-05

5.  Iatrogenic esophageal injuries: evidence-based management for diagnosis and timing of contrast studies after repair.

Authors:  Ellen Ko; A H O-Yurvati
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2012 Jan-Mar

6.  Self-expanding metal stents or nonstent endoscopic therapy: which is better for anastomotic leaks after total gastrectomy?

Authors:  Choong Nam Shim; Hyoung-Il Kim; Woo Jin Hyung; Sung Hoon Noh; Mi Kyung Song; Dae Ryong Kang; Jun Chul Park; Hyuk Lee; Sung Kwan Shin; Yong Chan Lee; Sang Kil Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  How to treat esophageal perforations when determinants and predictors of mortality are considered.

Authors:  Andrej Udelnow; Markus Huber-Lang; Markus Juchems; Karl Träger; Doris Henne-Bruns; Peter Würl
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 8.  Current treatment and outcome of esophageal perforations in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of 75 studies.

Authors:  Fausto Biancari; Vito D'Andrea; Rosalba Paone; Carlo Di Marco; Grazia Savino; Vesa Koivukangas; Juha Saarnio; Ersilia Lucenteforte
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Conservative management for an esophageal perforation in a patient presented with delayed diagnosis: a case report.

Authors:  Konstantinos Tsalis; Konstantinos Blouhos; Dimitrios Kapetanos; Theodore Kontakiotis; Charalampos Lazaridis
Journal:  Cases J       Date:  2009-10-22

10.  Conservative management for an esophageal perforation in a patient presented with delayed diagnosis: a case report review of the literature.

Authors:  Konstantinos Tsalis; Konstantinos Blouhos; Dimitrios Kapetanos; Theodore Kontakiotis; Charalampos Lazaridis
Journal:  Cases J       Date:  2009-09-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.