BACKGROUND: The current prognosis of esophageal perforation and the efficacy of available treatment methods are not well defined. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of esophageal perforations published from January 2000 to April 2012 and subjected a proportion of the retrieved data to a meta-analysis. Meta-regression was performed to determine predictors of mortality immediately after esophageal perforation. RESULTS: Analysis of 75 studies resulted in a pooled mortality of 11.9 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 9.7-14.3: 75 studies with 2,971 patients] with a mean hospital stay of 32.9 days (95 % CI 16.9-48.9: 28 studies with 1,233 patients). Cervical perforations had a pooled mortality of 5.9 %, thoracic perforations 10.9 %, and intraabdominal perforations 13.2 %. Mortality after esophageal perforation secondary to foreign bodies was 2.1 %, iatrogenic perforation 13.2 %, and spontaneous perforation 14.8 %. Treatment started within 24 h after the event resulted in a mortality rate of 7.4 % compared with 20.3 % in patients treated later (risk ratio 2.279, 95 % CI 1.632-3.182). Primary repair was associated with a pooled mortality of 9.5 %, esophagectomy 13.8 %, T-tube or any other tube repair 20.0 %, and stent-grafting 7.3 %. CONCLUSIONS: Results of recent studies indicate that mortality after esophageal perforation is high despite any definitive surgical or conservative strategy. Stent-grafting is associated with somewhat lower mortality rates, but studies may be biased by patient selection and limited experience.
BACKGROUND: The current prognosis of esophageal perforation and the efficacy of available treatment methods are not well defined. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of esophageal perforations published from January 2000 to April 2012 and subjected a proportion of the retrieved data to a meta-analysis. Meta-regression was performed to determine predictors of mortality immediately after esophageal perforation. RESULTS: Analysis of 75 studies resulted in a pooled mortality of 11.9 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 9.7-14.3: 75 studies with 2,971 patients] with a mean hospital stay of 32.9 days (95 % CI 16.9-48.9: 28 studies with 1,233 patients). Cervical perforations had a pooled mortality of 5.9 %, thoracic perforations 10.9 %, and intraabdominal perforations 13.2 %. Mortality after esophageal perforation secondary to foreign bodies was 2.1 %, iatrogenic perforation 13.2 %, and spontaneous perforation 14.8 %. Treatment started within 24 h after the event resulted in a mortality rate of 7.4 % compared with 20.3 % in patients treated later (risk ratio 2.279, 95 % CI 1.632-3.182). Primary repair was associated with a pooled mortality of 9.5 %, esophagectomy 13.8 %, T-tube or any other tube repair 20.0 %, and stent-grafting 7.3 %. CONCLUSIONS: Results of recent studies indicate that mortality after esophageal perforation is high despite any definitive surgical or conservative strategy. Stent-grafting is associated with somewhat lower mortality rates, but studies may be biased by patient selection and limited experience.
Authors: M Tettey; F Edwin; E Aniteye; L Sereboe; M Tamatey; K Entsua-Mensah; D Kotei; K Frimpong-Boateng Journal: Trop Doct Date: 2011-08-10 Impact factor: 0.731
Authors: Peter D Siersema; Marjolein Y V Homs; Jelle Haringsma; Huug W Tilanus; Ernst J Kuipers Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Fausto Biancari; Juha Saarnio; Ari Mennander; Linda Hypén; Paulina Salminen; Kari Kuttila; Mikael Victorzon; Camilla Böckelman; Enrico Tarantino; Olivier Tiffet; Vesa Koivukangas; Jon Arne Søreide; Asgaut Viste; Luigi Bonavina; Halla Vidarsdóttir; Tomas Gudbjartsson Journal: World J Surg Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Jonathan Loeck; Hans-Jürgen von Lücken; Adrian Münscher; Christian Theodor Müller; Gunnar Loske Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2021-03-14 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Fabian Schmidt; Rudolf Mennigen; Thorsten Vowinkel; Philipp A Neumann; Norbert Senninger; Daniel Palmes; Mike G Laukoetter Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 4.129