Literature DB >> 16175363

The role of spatial disparity and hemifields in audio-visual temporal order judgments.

Mirjam Keetels1, Jean Vroomen.   

Abstract

We explored whether sensitivity to audio-visual temporal order judgments (TOJs) was affected by the amount of spatial separation between a sound and light, and by whether the sound and light were presented in the same or in different hemifields. Participants made TOJs about noise bursts and light flashes, and judged whether the stimuli came from the same location or not. Flashes were presented either in the left or right hemifield (at +/-10 degrees from central fixation), and sounds either came from the same location as the lights, or at small or large disparities (20 or 40 degrees from the light, respectively), thereby crossing the hemifields or not. TOJs became more accurate (i.e., the just noticeable difference, JND, became smaller) when spatial disparity increased and when hemifields were crossed. Location discrimination of the sound and light was affected similarly. These results demonstrate that audio-visual TOJs are critically dependent on both the relative position from which stimuli are presented and on whether stimuli cross hemifields or not.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16175363     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-0067-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  18 in total

1.  Auditory-visual spatial interaction and modularity

Authors:  M Radeau
Journal:  Curr Psychol Cogn       Date:  1994-02

2.  Auditory capture of vision: examining temporal ventriloquism.

Authors:  Sharon Morein-Zamir; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2003-06

3.  Lateralized auditory spatial perception and the contralaterality of cortical processing as studied with functional magnetic resonance imaging and magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  M G Woldorff; C Tempelmann; J Fell; C Tegeler; B Gaschler-Markefski; H Hinrichs; H J Heinz; H Scheich
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Auditory-visual interaction and the timing of inputs. Thomas (1941) revisited.

Authors:  M Radeau; P Bertelson
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1987

5.  Intermodal perception of temporal order and motor skills: effects of age.

Authors:  A J Dinnerstein; P Zlotogura
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1968-06

6.  Perception of temporal order and relative visual latency.

Authors:  R Rutschmann
Journal:  Science       Date:  1966-05-20       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Recalibration of temporal order perception by exposure to audio-visual asynchrony.

Authors:  Jean Vroomen; Mirjam Keetels; Beatrice de Gelder; Paul Bertelson
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2004-12

8.  Multisensory temporal order judgments: the role of hemispheric redundancy.

Authors:  Massimiliano Zampini; David I Shore; Charles Spence
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.997

9.  Audiovisual temporal order judgments.

Authors:  Massimiliano Zampini; David I Shore; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-22       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Temporal-order judgments and reaction time for stimuli of different modalities.

Authors:  P Jaśkowski; F Jaroszyk; D Hojan-Jezierska
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1990
View more
  37 in total

1.  The cross-modal spread of attention reveals differential constraints for the temporal and spatial linking of visual and auditory stimulus events.

Authors:  Sarah E Donohue; Kenneth C Roberts; Tineke Grent-'t-Jong; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Perceptual grouping impairs temporal resolution.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Nicol; David I Shore
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Multisensory integration compensates loss of sensitivity of visual temporal order in the elderly.

Authors:  Liselotte de Boer-Schellekens; Jean Vroomen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Auditory facilitation of visual-target detection persists regardless of retinal eccentricity and despite wide audiovisual misalignments.

Authors:  Ian C Fiebelkorn; John J Foxe; John S Butler; Sophie Molholm
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Temporal binding of auditory and rotational stimuli.

Authors:  Mark C Sanders; Nai-Yuan N Chang; Meghan M Hiss; Rosalie M Uchanski; Timothy E Hullar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Stimulus duration influences perceived simultaneity in audiovisual temporal-order judgment.

Authors:  Lars T Boenke; Matthias Deliano; Frank W Ohl
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Interactions between the spatial and temporal stimulus factors that influence multisensory integration in human performance.

Authors:  Ryan A Stevenson; Juliane Krueger Fister; Zachary P Barnett; Aaron R Nidiffer; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-24       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Observers can reliably identify illusory flashes in the illusory flash paradigm.

Authors:  Jan B F van Erp; Tom G Philippi; Peter Werkhoven
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Visual presentation of hand image modulates visuo-tactile temporal order judgment.

Authors:  Masakazu Ide; Souta Hidaka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-05-12       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Intermodal attention affects the processing of the temporal alignment of audiovisual stimuli.

Authors:  Durk Talsma; Daniel Senkowski; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.