Literature DB >> 11540554

Auditory-visual spatial interaction and modularity

M Radeau1.   

Abstract

The results of dealing with the conditions for pairing visual and auditory data coming from spatially separate locations argue for cognitive impenetrability and computational autonomy, the pairing rules being the Gestalt principles of common fate and proximity. Other data provide evidence for pairing with several properties of modular functioning. Arguments for domain specificity are inferred from comparison with audio-visual speech. Suggestion of innate specification can be found in developmental data indicating that the grouping of visual and auditory signals is supported very early in life by the same principles that operate in adults. Support for a specific neural architecture comes from neurophysiological studies of the bimodal (auditory-visual) neurons of the cat superior colliculus. Auditory-visual pairing thus seems to present the four main properties of the Fodorian module.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 11540554     DOI: 10.1007/bf02686854

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Psychol Cogn


  2 in total

1.  Does Spearman's g decline at high IQ levels? Some evidence from Scotland.

Authors:  R Lynn
Journal:  J Genet Psychol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 1.509

2.  Race, social class, and IQ.

Authors:  S Scarr-Salapatek
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-12-24       Impact factor: 47.728

  2 in total
  15 in total

1.  Rapid adaptation to auditory-visual spatial disparity.

Authors:  Jörg Lewald
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  The role of spatial disparity and hemifields in audio-visual temporal order judgments.

Authors:  Mirjam Keetels; Jean Vroomen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-21       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Visual influences on perception of speech and nonspeech vocal-tract events.

Authors:  Lawrence Brancazio; Catherine T Best; Carol A Fowler
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.500

4.  Perceptual grouping impairs temporal resolution.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Nicol; David I Shore
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Brain responses to auditory and visual stimulus offset: shared representations of temporal edges.

Authors:  Marcus Herdener; Christoph Lehmann; Fabrizio Esposito; Francesco di Salle; Andrea Federspiel; Dominik R Bach; Klaus Scheffler; Erich Seifritz
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Auditory dominance over vision in the perception of interval duration.

Authors:  David Burr; Martin S Banks; Maria Concetta Morrone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Short-Term Audiovisual Spatial Training Enhances Electrophysiological Correlates of Auditory Selective Spatial Attention.

Authors:  Christina Hanenberg; Michael-Christian Schlüter; Stephan Getzmann; Jörg Lewald
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Redundant sensory information does not enhance sequence learning in the serial reaction time task.

Authors:  Elger L Abrahamse; Rob H J van der Lubbe; Willem B Verwey; Izabela Szumska; Piotr Jaśkowski
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2012-03-01

9.  Diminished sensitivity of audiovisual temporal order in autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Liselotte de Boer-Schellekens; Mart Eussen; Jean Vroomen
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-27

10.  No effect of auditory-visual spatial disparity on temporal recalibration.

Authors:  Mirjam Keetels; Jean Vroomen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.