Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Temporal-order judgments and reaction time for stimuli of different modalities.

Literature DB >> 2377723

Temporal-order judgments and reaction time for stimuli of different modalities.

P Jaśkowski¹, F Jaroszyk, D Hojan-Jezierska.

Abstract

Reaction times and the relative latency evaluated by the temporal-order-judgment method for two stimuli of different modalities (visual and auditory) were measured. The difference between reaction times for visual and auditory stimuli was about 40 ms. The relative latency was slightly shorter, however; in conflict with Rutschmann and Link's (1964) previous result, the auditory stimulus must be delayed to be perceived simultaneously with the visual one.

Entities: Disease

Mesh：

Year: 1990 PMID： 2377723 DOI： 10.1007/bf00867209

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Psychol Res ISSN： 0340-0727

9 in total

1. PERCEPTION OF TEMPORAL ORDER OF STIMULI DIFFERING IN SENSE MODE AND SIMPLE REACTION TIME.

Authors: J RUTSCHMANN; R LINK
Journal: Percept Mot Skills Date: 1964-04

2. Perceived order in different sense modalities.

Authors: I J HIRSH; C E SHERRICK
Journal: J Exp Psychol Date: 1961-11

3. Threshold models of temporal-order judgments evaluated by a ternary response task.

Authors: R Ulrich
Journal: Percept Psychophys Date: 1987-09

4. Dynamic properties of vision. V. Perception lag and reaction time in relation to flicker and flash thresholds.

Authors: J A Roufs
Journal: Vision Res Date: 1974-09 Impact factor: 1.886

5. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors: H Levitt
Journal: J Acoust Soc Am Date: 1971-02 Impact factor: 1.840

6. A double-response paradigm to study stimulus intensity effects upon the motor system in simple reaction time experiments.

Authors: R Ulrich; K H Stapf
Journal: Percept Psychophys Date: 1984-12

7. Perceptual delay: a consequence of metacontrast and apparent motion.

Authors: R Didner; G Sperling
Journal: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform Date: 1980-05 Impact factor: 3.332

8. Successiveness discrimination as a two-state, quantal process.

Authors: A B Kristofferson
Journal: Science Date: 1967-12-08 Impact factor: 47.728

9. Attention and psychophysical time.

Authors: A B Kristofferson
Journal: Acta Psychol (Amst) Date: 1967

9 in total

19 in total

10. Temporal-order judgment of visual and auditory stimuli: modulations in situations with and without stimulus discrimination.

Authors: Elisabeth Hendrich; Tilo Strobach; Martin Buss; Hermann J Müller; Torsten Schubert
Journal: Front Integr Neurosci Date: 2012-08-25

Temporal-order judgments and reaction time for stimuli of different modalities.

1. PERCEPTION OF TEMPORAL ORDER OF STIMULI DIFFERING IN SENSE MODE AND SIMPLE REACTION TIME.

2. Perceived order in different sense modalities.

3. Threshold models of temporal-order judgments evaluated by a ternary response task.

4. Dynamic properties of vision. V. Perception lag and reaction time in relation to flicker and flash thresholds.

5. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

6. A double-response paradigm to study stimulus intensity effects upon the motor system in simple reaction time experiments.

7. Perceptual delay: a consequence of metacontrast and apparent motion.

8. Successiveness discrimination as a two-state, quantal process.

9. Attention and psychophysical time.

1. Temporal-order judgment and reaction time for short and long stimuli.

2. The role of spatial disparity and hemifields in audio-visual temporal order judgments.

3. Perceived timing of vestibular stimulation relative to touch, light and sound.

4. Stimulus duration influences perceived simultaneity in audiovisual temporal-order judgment.

5. Combined effects of motor response, sensory modality, and stimulus intensity on temporal reproduction.

6. Visual presentation of hand image modulates visuo-tactile temporal order judgment.

7. A model of synchronization of motor acts to a stimulus sequence. I. Timing and error corrections.

8. Efficient visual search from synchronized auditory signals requires transient audiovisual events.

9. Audiovisual temporal order judgments.

10. Temporal-order judgment of visual and auditory stimuli: modulations in situations with and without stimulus discrimination.