Literature DB >> 16156186

The effects of age and task context on Stroop task performance.

Sharon A Mutter1, Jennifer C Naylor, Emily R Patterson.   

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the impact of age and task context on Stroop task performance, using error scores, response latencies, and process dissociation estimates (e.g., Lindsay & Jacoby, 1994). Across three experiments, the findings showed that although older adults were able to evaluate Stroop task demands and modify their representations of task context in response to this knowledge, they were less able to maintain and update these representations on a trial-by-trial basis in tasks with high stimulus uncertainty or ambiguity. Moreover, although there was no age-related decline in the ability to modulate print color information, older adults were consistently less able to control the activation of conflicting word information. Together, these findings suggest that whereas age differences in the Stroop task may be magnified under conditions that promote transient failures to maintain task context, the primary source of these differences seems to be a more enduring decline in the efficiency of processes that are responsible for suppressing the activation of irrelevant lexical information.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16156186     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  25 in total

1.  Age differences in the selection of mental sets: the role of inhibition, stimulus ambiguity, and response-set overlap.

Authors:  U Mayr
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2001-03

2.  Age-related decline in inhibitory control contributes to the increased Stroop effect observed in older adults.

Authors:  R West; C Alain
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Interference effects of Stroop color-word test in childhood, adulthood, and aging.

Authors:  P E COMALLI; S WAPNER; H WERNER
Journal:  J Genet Psychol       Date:  1962-03       Impact factor: 1.509

Review 4.  Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review.

Authors:  C M MacLeod
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Stroop performance in healthy younger and older adults and in individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer's type.

Authors:  D H Spieler; D A Balota; M E Faust
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  The stroop effect and the myth of automaticity.

Authors:  D Besner; J A Stolz; C Boutilier
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1997-06

7.  Process dissociation, cognitive architecture, and response time: comments on Lindsay and Jacoby (1994)

Authors:  A P Hillstrom; G D Logan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Attentional modulation of neural processing of shape, color, and velocity in humans.

Authors:  M Corbetta; F M Miezin; S Dobmeyer; G L Shulman; S E Petersen
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-06-22       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Distinguishing conscious from unconscious perceptual processes.

Authors:  J Cheesman; P M Merikle
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1986-12

10.  Mechanisms underlying reduction in Stroop interference with practice for young and old adults.

Authors:  C L Dulaney; W A Rogers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  14 in total

1.  The role of age and prior beliefs in contingency judgment.

Authors:  Sharon A Mutter; Laura M Strain; Leslie F Plumlee
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-07

2.  Inhibition in aging: What is preserved? What declines? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alodie Rey-Mermet; Miriam Gade
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

3.  The effects of age and divided attention on spontaneous recognition.

Authors:  Benjamin A Anderson; Larry L Jacoby; Ruthann C Thomas; David A Balota
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-05

4.  Age-Related Differences in Motivational Integration and Cognitive Control.

Authors:  Debbie M Yee; Sarah Adams; Asad Beck; Todd S Braver
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Dynamic adjustments of attentional control in healthy aging.

Authors:  Andrew J Aschenbrenner; David A Balota
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2017-02

6.  The utility of placing recollection in opposition to familiarity in early discrimination of healthy aging and very mild dementia of the Alzheimer's type.

Authors:  Chi-Shing Tse; David A Balota; Sarah C Moynan; Janet M Duchek; Larry L Jacoby
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Multiple levels of control in the Stroop task.

Authors:  Julie M Bugg; Larry L Jacoby; Jeffrey P Toth
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-12

8.  The flexibility of cognitive control: Age equivalence with experience guiding the way.

Authors:  Emily R Cohen-Shikora; Nathaniel T Diede; Julie M Bugg
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2018-08-06

9.  Conflict-triggered top-down control: default mode, last resort, or no such thing?

Authors:  Julie M Bugg
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Event-related brain potentials reveal strategy selection in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Daniel C Bowie; Kathy A Low; Monica Fabiani; Gabriele Gratton
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 3.111

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.