Literature DB >> 8151280

Mechanisms underlying reduction in Stroop interference with practice for young and old adults.

C L Dulaney1, W A Rogers.   

Abstract

Age-related factors in the reduction of Stroop interference with practice were examined in 3 studies. Young and old adults received extensive practice on a modified version of the Stroop task. Both groups showed reduced interference on the Stroop task with practice. Results suggest that young adults' reduction in Stroop interference was due to general task factors plus the development of a reading suppression response. The old adults' reduction in Stroop interference was attributed primarily to general task factors. Results indicate that old adults have greater difficulty than young adults in developing new automatic processes and modifying existing automatic processes. The implication of these findings for current models of Stroop interference is that, in addition to automatic processing, attentional mechanisms must be incorporated to account for the age-related differences.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8151280     DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.20.2.470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  35 in total

1.  Naming the color of a word: is it responses or task sets that compete?

Authors:  S Monsell; T J Taylor; K Murphy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-01

2.  Working memory and stroop interference: an individual differences investigation.

Authors:  Debra L Long; Chantel S Prat
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-03

3.  Behavioral conflict, anterior cingulate cortex, and experiment duration: implications of diverging data.

Authors:  Kirk I Erickson; Michael P Milham; Stanley J Colcombe; Arthur F Kramer; Marie T Banich; Andrew Webb; Neal J Cohen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Novel Symbol Learning-Induced Stroop Effect: Evidence for a Strategy-Based, Utility Learning Model.

Authors:  Jin Wang; Huijun Tang; Yuan Deng
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2016-10

5.  The effects of age and task context on Stroop task performance.

Authors:  Sharon A Mutter; Jennifer C Naylor; Emily R Patterson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-04

6.  Stroop interference, practice, and aging.

Authors:  Douglas J Davidson; Rose T Zacks; Carrick C Williams
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2003-06

7.  Mild acute stress improves response speed without impairing accuracy or interference control in two selective attention tasks: Implications for theories of stress and cognition.

Authors:  Grant S Shields; Andrew M Rivers; Michelle M Ramey; Brian C Trainor; Andrew P Yonelinas
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 4.905

8.  Overnight sleep loss and "executive" decision making-subtle findings.

Authors:  Jim Horne
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 5.849

9.  Age-related increases in Stroop interference: delineation of general slowing based on behavioral and white matter analyses.

Authors:  Dominik Wolf; Lisa Zschutschke; Armin Scheurich; Florian Schmitz; Klaus Lieb; Oliver Tüscher; Andreas Fellgiebel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Don't believe everything you hear: Routine validation of audiovisual information in children and adults.

Authors:  Benjamin A Piest; Maj-Britt Isberner; Tobias Richter
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.