Literature DB >> 21264592

The effects of age and divided attention on spontaneous recognition.

Benjamin A Anderson1, Larry L Jacoby, Ruthann C Thomas, David A Balota.   

Abstract

Studies of recognition typically involve tests in which the participant's memory for a stimulus is directly questioned. There are occasions however, in which memory occurs more spontaneously (e.g., an acquaintance seeming familiar out of context). Spontaneous recognition was investigated in a novel paradigm involving study of pictures and words followed by recognition judgments on stimuli with an old or new word superimposed over an old or new picture. Participants were instructed to make their recognition decision on either the picture or word and to ignore the distracting stimulus. Spontaneous recognition was measured as the influence of old vs. new distracters on target recognition. Across two experiments, older adults and younger adults placed under divided-attention showed a greater tendency to spontaneously recognize old distracters as compared to full-attention younger adults. The occurrence of spontaneous recognition is discussed in relation to ability to constrain retrieval to goal-relevant information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21264592     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-010-0046-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  33 in total

1.  Task-set switching and long-term memory retrieval.

Authors:  U Mayr; R Kliegl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Stroop performance in healthy younger and older adults and in individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer's type.

Authors:  D H Spieler; D A Balota; M E Faust
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Modes of cognitive control in recognition and source memory: depth of retrieval.

Authors:  Larry L Jacoby; Yujiro Shimizu; Karen A Daniels; Matthew G Rhodes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-10

4.  Aging and inhibitory control in text comprehension.

Authors:  J Dywan; W E Murphy
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1996-06

5.  Inhibition of visual and conceptual information during reading in healthy aging and Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  J M Duchek; D A Balota; V C Thessing
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  1998-09

6.  Recognition memory and attentional selection: serial scanning is not enough.

Authors:  B A Eriksen; C W Eriksen; J E Hoffman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Automatic versus intentional uses of memory: aging, attention, and control.

Authors:  J M Jennings; L L Jacoby
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1993-06

8.  Episodic remembering creates access to involuntary conscious memory: demonstrating involuntary recall on a voluntary recall task.

Authors:  John H Mace
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2006-11

9.  The English Lexicon Project.

Authors:  David A Balota; Melvin J Yap; Michael J Cortese; Keith A Hutchison; Brett Kessler; Bjorn Loftis; James H Neely; Douglas L Nelson; Greg B Simpson; Rebecca Treiman
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-08

10.  Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart's object pictorial set: the role of surface detail in basic-level object recognition.

Authors:  Bruno Rossion; Gilles Pourtois
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  7 in total

1.  The process-dissociation approach two decades later: convergence, boundary conditions, and new directions.

Authors:  Andrew P Yonelinas; Larry L Jacoby
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-07

2.  Divided attention reduces resistance to distraction at encoding but not retrieval.

Authors:  Jennifer C Weeks; Lynn Hasher
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

3.  On the importance of looking back: the role of recursive remindings in recency judgments and cued recall.

Authors:  Larry L Jacoby; Christopher N Wahlheim
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-07

4.  Inducing involuntary and voluntary mental time travel using a laboratory paradigm.

Authors:  Scott N Cole; Søren R Staugaard; Dorthe Berntsen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-04

5.  Visual Acuity does not Moderate Effect Sizes of Higher-Level Cognitive Tasks.

Authors:  James R Houston; Ilana J Bennett; Philip A Allen; David J Madden
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.645

6.  Reflections of distraction in memory: transfer of previous distraction improves recall in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Ruthann C Thomas; Lynn Hasher
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Judging the familiarity of strangers: does the context matter?

Authors:  Samantha A Deffler; Alan S Brown; Elizabeth J Marsh
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-08
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.