Literature DB >> 16151713

Minimally-invasive technique for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).

Burak M Ozgur1, Kevin Yoo, Gerardo Rodriguez, William R Taylor.   

Abstract

Minimal access surgical techniques have been described for diskectomy and laminectomy procedures performed through tubular exposures. Tubular exposures, however, restrain visibility to a fixed diameter and require co-axial instrument manipulation. An independent blade retractor system has been developed to overcome the obstacles of working through a tube. Decompression and circumferential fusion can be accomplished through this minimal access exposure via a combination of laminectomy and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) coupled with minimally invasive pedicle screw fixation. Herein, we describe a minimally-invasive technique for TLIF exposure. Illustrations, intraoperative photographs, and fluoroscopic images supplement this technique. We found that the described minimally-invasive system provides comparable exposure to the traditional-open techniques with the benefits of minimally-invasive techniques. Additionally, it does not have the added constraints of a tubular system. We were able to perform TLIFs without any additional complications. Minimal access decompression and TLIF can be performed safely and effectively using this minimally-invasive system. Besides the retractor system, no additional specialized instruments are required. An operative microscope is not required, in fact, all our cases were performed using operative loupes. The light attachment provides superb visbility without the discomfort of having to wear a headlight. Thus far we have found no added risks or complications using this system. We are currently working on long-term analysis and follow-up to further evaluate this system's efficacy.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16151713     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-005-0941-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  14 in total

1.  A prospective comparison of surgical approach for anterior L4-L5 fusion: laparoscopic versus mini anterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  T A Zdeblick; S M David
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Anterior/posterior lumbar fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: analysis of complications and predictive factors.

Authors:  H T Hee; F P Castro; M E Majd; R T Holt; L Myers
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  2001-12

Review 3.  Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Alan Moskowitz
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.472

4.  Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: technique, complications, and early results.

Authors:  W S Rosenberg; P V Mummaneni
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 5.  Minimally invasive endoscopic surgery of the spine.

Authors:  J A Goldstein; P C McAfee
Journal:  J South Orthop Assoc       Date:  1996

6.  Posterior lumbar interbody fusion. A biomechanical comparison, including a new threaded cage.

Authors:  D S Brodke; J C Dick; D N Kunz; R McCabe; T A Zdeblick
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Comparison of posterior and transforaminal approaches to lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  S C Humphreys; S D Hodges; A G Patwardhan; J C Eck; R B Murphy; L A Covington
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Laparoscopic approach to L4-L5 for interbody fusion using BAK cages: experience in the first 58 cases.

Authors:  J J Regan; R J Aronoff; D D Ohnmeiss; D K Sengupta
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Unilateral transforaminal posterior lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): indications, technique, and 2-year results.

Authors:  Thomas G Lowe; A David Tahernia; Michael F O'Brien; David A B Smith
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2002-02

10.  Transforaminal interbody fusion versus anterior-posterior interbody fusion of the lumbar spine: a financial analysis.

Authors:  T S Whitecloud ; W W Roesch; J E Ricciardi
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  2001-04
View more
  27 in total

1.  Minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion as revision surgery for patients previously treated by open discectomy and decompression of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Jian Wang; Yue Zhou; Zheng Feng Zhang; Chang Qing Li; Wen Jie Zheng; Jie Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: evaluating initial experience.

Authors:  Constantin Schizas; Nicolas Tzinieris; Elefterios Tsiridis; Victor Kosmopoulos
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Biomechanical evaluation of a new AxiaLIF technique for two-level lumbar fusion.

Authors:  Serkan Erkan; Chunhui Wu; Amir A Mehbod; Brian Hsu; Douglas W Pahl; Ensor E Transfeldt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  In vitro comparison of endplate preparation between four mini-open interbody fusion approaches.

Authors:  Robert Tatsumi; Yu-Po Lee; Kaveh Khajavi; William Taylor; Foster Chen; Hyun Bae
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Minimally invasive procedures on the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Branko Skovrlj; Jeffrey Gilligan; Holt S Cutler; Sheeraz A Qureshi
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 1.337

6.  Disc space preparation in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a comparison of minimally invasive and open approaches.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Rihn; Sapan D Gandhi; Patrick Sheehan; Alexander R Vaccaro; Alan S Hilibrand; Todd J Albert; David G Anderson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Alan T Villavicencio; Sigita Burneikiene; Cassandra M Roeca; E Lee Nelson; Alexander Mason
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2010-05-31

8.  Comparison between Instrumented Mini-TLIF and Instrumented Circumferential Fusion in Adult Low-Grade Lytic Spondylolisthesis : Can Mini-TLIF with PPF Replace Circumferential Fusion?

Authors:  Jin-Sung Kim; Dong-Hyun Kim; Sang-Ho Lee
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2009-02-28

9.  Perioperative and short-term advantages of mini-open approach for lumbar spinal fusion.

Authors:  J Rodríguez-Vela; A Lobo-Escolar; E Joven-Aliaga; A Herrera; J Vicente; E Suñén; A Loste; A Tabuenca
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Clinical outcomes of minimally invasive versus open approach for one-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at the 3- to 4-year follow-up.

Authors:  Javier Rodríguez-Vela; Antonio Lobo-Escolar; Eduardo Joven; Javier Muñoz-Marín; Antonio Herrera; José Velilla
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.