Literature DB >> 11270547

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: technique, complications, and early results.

W S Rosenberg1, P V Mummaneni.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the safety, surgical efficacy, and advantages of the transforaminal approach for lumbar interbody fusion when combined with pedicle screw fixation.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 22 patients (age range, 34-63 yr; mean, 49 yr) with Grade I or II spondylolisthesis who underwent transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Nineteen patients presented with low back pain and associated radiculopathy, and three presented with low back pain only. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion was performed at L4-L5 in 8 patients, L5-S1 in 11 patients, L3-L4 and L4-L5 in 2 patients, and L4-L5 and L5-S1 in 1 patient. Periodic follow-up took place 1 to 12 months after surgery (mean, 5.3 mo). Decompression is performed according to clinical circumstances. Pedicle screws are placed, and a discectomy is carried out. The cartilaginous endplates are removed. The interspace is gradually distracted, resulting in lost disc height being regained, and interbody fusion cages are positioned. The pedicle screw-and-rod construct is then compressed, restoring lumbar lordosis.
RESULTS: Low back pain completely resolved in 16 patients, moderate relief from pain was achieved in 5 patients, and the pain was unchanged in one patient. Nonneurological complications included intraoperative durotomy in one patient and postoperative wound infection in two. In one patient, postoperative mild L5 motor paresis resolved. One patient had a temporary brachial plexopathy due to intraoperative positioning, and one patient had peripheral polyneuropathy secondary to prolonged intraoperative blood pressure cuff inflation.
CONCLUSION: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion is a safe and effective method for achieving circumferential spinal fusion via a single-stage procedure. This procedure is particularly useful in restoring disc space height and lumbar lordosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11270547     DOI: 10.1097/00006123-200103000-00022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  58 in total

1.  Comparison of SpineJet XL and Conventional Instrumentation for Disk Space Preparation in Unilateral Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Han-Yong Huh; Cheol Ji; Kyeong-Sik Ryu; Chun-Kun Park
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2010-05-31

2.  Minimally-invasive technique for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).

Authors:  Burak M Ozgur; Kevin Yoo; Gerardo Rodriguez; William R Taylor
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  [Interbody metal implants ("cages") for lumbar fusion].

Authors:  G Freiherr von Salis-Soglio; R Scholz; K Seller
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Current concepts on spinal arthrodesis in degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Marios G Lykissas; Alexander Aichmair
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 1.337

5.  Surgical treatments for degenerative lumbar scoliosis: a meta analysis.

Authors:  Guohua Wang; Jianzhong Hu; Xiangyang Liu; Yong Cao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  A morphometric analysis of contralateral neural foramen in TLIF.

Authors:  Pyung Goo Cho; Sang Hyuk Park; Keung Nyun Kim; Yoon Ha; Do Heum Yoon; Dong Ah Shin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Posterolateral versus circumferential instrumented fusion for monosegmental lumbar degenerative disc disease using an expandable cage.

Authors:  Panagiotis Korovessis; Thomas Repantis; Andreas Baikousis; Panagiotis Iliopoulos
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2011-10-21

8.  Radiographic results of single level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative lumbar spine disease: focusing on changes of segmental lordosis in fusion segment.

Authors:  Sang-Bum Kim; Taek-Soo Jeon; Youn-Moo Heo; Woo-Suk Lee; Jin-Woong Yi; Tae-Kyun Kim; Cheol-Mog Hwang
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2009-11-25

9.  Adjacent segment degeneration and revision surgery after circumferential lumbar fusion: outcomes throughout 15 years of follow-up.

Authors:  José I Maruenda; Carlos Barrios; Felipe Garibo; Borja Maruenda
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Alan T Villavicencio; Sigita Burneikiene; Cassandra M Roeca; E Lee Nelson; Alexander Mason
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2010-05-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.