Literature DB >> 25610845

Minimally invasive procedures on the lumbar spine.

Branko Skovrlj1, Jeffrey Gilligan1, Holt S Cutler1, Sheeraz A Qureshi1.   

Abstract

Degenerative disease of the lumbar spine is a common and increasingly prevalent condition that is often implicated as the primary reason for chronic low back pain and the leading cause of disability in the western world. Surgical management of lumbar degenerative disease has historically been approached by way of open surgical procedures aimed at decompressing and/or stabilizing the lumbar spine. Advances in technology and surgical instrumentation have led to minimally invasive surgical techniques being developed and increasingly used in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease. Compared to the traditional open spine surgery, minimally invasive techniques require smaller incisions and decrease approach-related morbidity by avoiding muscle crush injury by self-retaining retractors, preventing the disruption of tendon attachment sites of important muscles at the spinous processes, using known anatomic neurovascular and muscle planes, and minimizing collateral soft-tissue injury by limiting the width of the surgical corridor. The theoretical benefits of minimally invasive surgery over traditional open surgery include reduced blood loss, decreased postoperative pain and narcotics use, shorter hospital length of stay, faster recover and quicker return to work and normal activity. This paper describes the different minimally invasive techniques that are currently available for the treatment of degenerative disease of the lumbar spine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decompression; Degenerative disease; Indirect decompression techniques; Interbody fusion; Lumbar spine; Minimally invasive surgery; Posterolateral fusion; Spine surgery

Year:  2015        PMID: 25610845      PMCID: PMC4295214          DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v3.i1.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Clin Cases        ISSN: 2307-8960            Impact factor:   1.337


  68 in total

1.  Long-term disability and return to work among patients who have a herniated lumbar disc: the effect of disability compensation.

Authors:  S J Atlas; Y Chang; E Kammann; R B Keller; R A Deyo; D E Singer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Lumbar decompression using a traditional midline approach versus a tubular retractor system: comparison of patient-based clinical outcomes.

Authors:  D Greg Anderson; Amar Patel; Mitchell Maltenfort; Alexander R Vaccaro; John Ratliff; Alan Hilibrand; James S Harrop; Ashwini D Sharan; Ravi K Ponnappan; Jeffrey Rihn; Todd J Albert
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Intraoperative and early postoperative complications in extreme lateral interbody fusion: an analysis of 600 cases.

Authors:  W Blake Rodgers; Edward J Gerber; Jamie Patterson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Lumbar fusion in octogenarians: the promise of minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  William Blake Rodgers; Edward J Gerber; Jody A Rodgers
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Analysis of operative complications in a series of 471 anterior lumbar interbody fusion procedures.

Authors:  Rick C Sasso; Natalie M Best; Praveen V Mummaneni; Thomas M Reilly; Sajjad M Hussain
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Occult spinous process fractures associated with interspinous process spacers.

Authors:  David H Kim; Mark Tantorski; Jeremy Shaw; Juli Martha; Ling Li; Nael Shanti; Tal Rencu; Stephen Parazin; Brian Kwon
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 7.  Minimal access spinal technologies: state-of-the-art, indications, and techniques.

Authors:  Richard Assaker
Journal:  Joint Bone Spine       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.929

8.  Vascular injury during anterior lumbar surgery.

Authors:  Salvador A Brau; Rick B Delamarter; Michael L Schiffman; Lytton A Williams; Robert G Watkins
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 9.  Analysis of complications in patients treated with the X-Stop Interspinous Process Decompression System: proposal for a novel anatomic scoring system for patient selection and review of the literature.

Authors:  Giuseppe M V Barbagallo; Giuseppe Olindo; Leonardo Corbino; Vincenzo Albanese
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Major vascular injury during anterior lumbar spinal surgery: incidence, risk factors, and management.

Authors:  Gary A Fantini; Ioannis P Pappou; Federico P Girardi; Harvinder S Sandhu; Frank P Cammisa
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  MIS lateral spine surgery: a systematic literature review of complications, outcomes, and economics.

Authors:  Jeff A Lehmen; Edward J Gerber
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Multimodal analgesia in pain management after spine surgery.

Authors:  Joon S Yoo; Junyoung Ahn; Asokumar Buvanendran; Kern Singh
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-09

3.  Evidence Based Medicine Review of Posterior Thoracolumbar Minimally Invasive Technology.

Authors:  Charla R Fischer; Bryan Beaubrun; Jordan Manning; Sheeraz Qureshi; Juan Uribe
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-12-21

4.  Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison of Grade I Versus Grade II Isthmic Spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Dustin H Massel; Benjamin C Mayo; William W Long; Krishna D Modi; Gregory D Lopez; Grant D Shifflett; Bryce A Basques; Philip K Louie; Daniel D Bohl; Fady Y Hijji; Ankur S Narain; Kern Singh
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-04-30

5.  Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison of Isthmic Versus Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Dustin H Massel; Benjamin C Mayo; Grant D Shifflett; Daniel D Bohl; Philip K Louie; Bryce A Basques; William W Long; Krishna D Modi; Fady Y Hijji; Ankur S Narain; Kern Singh
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-04-30

Review 6.  Operative Management of Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease.

Authors:  Yu Chao Lee; Mario Giuseppe Tedesco Zotti; Orso Lorenzo Osti
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2016-08-16

7.  Injectable and compression-resistant low-viscosity polymer/ceramic composite carriers for rhBMP-2 in a rabbit model of posterolateral fusion: a pilot study.

Authors:  Stefanie M Shiels; Anne D Talley; Madison A P McGough; Katarzyna J Zienkiewicz; Kerem Kalpakci; Daniel Shimko; Scott A Guelcher; Joseph C Wenke
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 8.  A systematic literature review of time to return to work and narcotic use after lumbar spinal fusion using minimal invasive and open surgery techniques.

Authors:  Xuan Wang; Benny Borgman; Simona Vertuani; Jonas Nilsson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Risk factors predicting less favorable outcomes in endoscopic lumbar discectomies.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Katzell
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-01

10.  Comparison of safety and efficiency of microendoscopic discectomy with automatic nerve retractor and with nerve hook.

Authors:  He-Ping Yin; Yu-Peng Wang; Zhi-Ye Qiu; Zhi-Cai Du; Yi-Min Wu; Shu-Wen Li
Journal:  Regen Biomater       Date:  2016-09-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.