Literature DB >> 16151098

Colonization of cattle intestines by Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter lanienae.

G Douglas Inglis1, Lisa D Kalischuk, Hilma W Busz, John P Kastelic.   

Abstract

The location and abundance of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter lanienae in the intestines of beef cattle were investigated using real-time quantitative PCR in two studies. In an initial study, digesta and tissue samples were obtained along the digestive tract of two beef steers known to shed C. jejuni and C. lanienae (steers A and B). At the time of slaughter, steer B weighed 540 kg, compared to 600 kg for steer A, yet the intestine of steer B (40.5 m) was 36% longer than the intestine of steer A (26.1 m). In total, 323 digesta samples (20-cm intervals) and 998 tissue samples (3.3- to 6.7-cm intervals) were processed. Campylobacter DNA was detected in the digesta and in association with tissues throughout the small and large intestines of both animals. Although C. jejuni and C. lanienae DNA were detected in both animals, only steer A contained substantial quantities of C. jejuni DNA. In both digesta and tissues of steer A, C. jejuni was present in the duodenum and jejunum. Considerable quantities of C. jejuni DNA also were observed in the digesta obtained from the cecum and ascending colon, but minimal DNA was associated with tissues of these regions. In contrast, steer B contained substantial quantities of C. lanienae DNA, and DNA of this bacterium was limited to the large intestine (i.e., the cecum, proximal ascending colon, descending colon, and rectum); the majority of tissue-associated C. lanienae DNA was present in the cecum, descending colon, and rectum. In a second study, the location and abundance of C. jejuni and C. lanienae DNA were confirmed in the intestines of 20 arbitrarily selected beef cattle. DNA of C. jejuni and C. lanienae were detected in the digesta of 57% and 95% of the animals, respectively. C. jejuni associated with intestinal tissues was most abundant in the duodenum, ileum, and rectum. However, one animal contributed disproportionately to the abundance of C. jejuni DNA in the ileum and rectum. C. lanienae was most abundant in the large intestine, and the highest density of DNA of this bacterium was found in the cecum. Therefore, C. jejuni colonized the proximal small intestine of asymptomatic beef cattle, whereas C. lanienae primarily resided in the cecum, descending colon, and rectum. This information could be instrumental in developing efficacious strategies to manage the release of these bacteria from the gastrointestinal tracts of cattle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16151098      PMCID: PMC1214653          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.71.9.5145-5153.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  38 in total

1.  Enteric campylobacter infection in gnotobiotic calves and lambs.

Authors:  H R Terzolo; G H Lawson; K W Angus; D R Snodgrass
Journal:  Res Vet Sci       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 2.534

2.  Production of diarrhoea and dysentery in experimental calves by feeding pure cultures of Campylobacter fetus subspecies jejuni.

Authors:  R R Al-Mashat; D J Taylor
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  1980-11-15       Impact factor: 2.695

3.  Bacteria in enteric lesions of cattle.

Authors:  R R Al-Mashat; D J Taylor
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  1983-01-01       Impact factor: 2.695

4.  Pathogenicity of Campylobacter jejuni isolates from animals and humans.

Authors:  K I Manninen; J F Prescott; I R Dohoo
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 3.441

5.  Production of enteritis in calves by the oral inoculation of pure cultures of Campylobacter fecalis.

Authors:  R R Al-Mashat; D J Taylor
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  1981-08-01       Impact factor: 2.695

6.  Campylobacter fetus subsp jejuni: its possible significance in enteric disease of calves and lambs.

Authors:  B D Firehammer; L L Myers
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 1.156

7.  Production of enteritis in calves by the oral inoculation of pure cultures of Campylobacter fetus subspecies intestinalis.

Authors:  R R Al-Mashat; D J Taylor
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  1983-01-15       Impact factor: 2.695

8.  Isolation, characterization, and serotyping of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli from slaughter cattle.

Authors:  M M Garcia; H Lior; R B Stewart; G M Ruckerbauer; J R Trudel; A Skljarevski
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli inoculation of neonatal calves.

Authors:  D P Warner; J H Bryner
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 1.156

10.  Pancreas affection in association with enteritis due to Campylobacter fetus ssp. jejuni.

Authors:  A Pönkä; T U Kosunen
Journal:  Acta Med Scand       Date:  1981
View more
  17 in total

1.  Distribution and ecology of campylobacters in coastal plain streams (Georgia, United States of America).

Authors:  Ethell Vereen; R Richard Lowrance; Dana J Cole; Erin K Lipp
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Cloning, refolding, purification and preliminary crystallographic analysis of the sensory domain of the Campylobacter chemoreceptor for multiple ligands (CcmL).

Authors:  Mayra A Machuca; Yu C Liu; Simone A Beckham; Anna Roujeinikova
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr F Struct Biol Commun       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 1.056

3.  Subtype-Specific Selection for Resistance to Fluoroquinolones but Not to Tetracyclines Is Evident in Campylobacter jejuni Isolates from Beef Cattle in Confined Feeding Operations in Southern Alberta, Canada.

Authors:  Andrew L Webb; L Brent Selinger; Eduardo N Taboada; G Douglas Inglis
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Campylobacter shared between free-ranging cattle and sympatric wild ungulates in a natural environment (NE Spain).

Authors:  N Navarro-Gonzalez; M Ugarte-Ruiz; M C Porrero; L Zamora; G Mentaberre; E Serrano; A Mateos; S Lavín; L Domínguez
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.184

5.  Prevalence and risk factor investigation of Campylobacter species in beef cattle feces from seven large commercial feedlots in Alberta, Canada.

Authors:  Sherry J Hannon; Brenda Allan; Cheryl Waldner; Margaret L Russell; Andrew Potter; Lorne A Babiuk; Hugh G G Townsend
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.310

6.  Isolation of a Campylobacter lanienae-like bacterium from laboratory chinchillas (Chinchilla laniger).

Authors:  E E Turowski; Z Shen; R M Ducore; N M A Parry; A Kirega; F E Dewhirst; J G Fox
Journal:  Zoonoses Public Health       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 2.702

7.  Clinically Relevant Campylobacter jejuni Subtypes Are Readily Found and Transmitted within the Cattle Production Continuum but Present a Limited Foodborne Risk.

Authors:  G Douglas Inglis; Jenny F Gusse; Kathaleen E House; Tara G Shelton; Eduardo N Taboada
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Prevalence of Campylobacter species in adult Crohn's disease and the preferential colonization sites of Campylobacter species in the human intestine.

Authors:  Vikneswari Mahendran; Stephen M Riordan; Michael C Grimm; Thi Anh Tuyet Tran; Joelene Major; Nadeem O Kaakoush; Hazel Mitchell; Li Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Environmental and demographic risk factors for campylobacteriosis: do various geographical scales tell the same story?

Authors:  Julie Arsenault; Olaf Berke; Pascal Michel; André Ravel; Pierre Gosselin
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 3.090

10.  Campylobacter jejuni colonization is associated with a dysbiosis in the cecal microbiota of mice in the absence of prominent inflammation.

Authors:  Abdul G Lone; L Brent Selinger; Richard R E Uwiera; Yong Xu; G Douglas Inglis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.