Literature DB >> 24595731

Campylobacter shared between free-ranging cattle and sympatric wild ungulates in a natural environment (NE Spain).

N Navarro-Gonzalez1, M Ugarte-Ruiz, M C Porrero, L Zamora, G Mentaberre, E Serrano, A Mateos, S Lavín, L Domínguez.   

Abstract

Campylobacter infections are a public health concern and an increasingly common cause of food-borne zoonoses in the European Union. However, little is known about their spill-over from free-ranging livestock to sympatric wild ungulates, especially in regards to uncommon Campylobacter species. In this study, we aim to determine the prevalence of C. coli, C. jejuni and other C. spp. in game ungulates (wild boar Sus scrofa and Iberian ibex Capra pyrenaica) and free-ranging sympatric cattle in a National Game Reserve in NE Spain. Furthermore, we explore the extent to which Campylobacter species are shared among these co-habiting hosts. Faecal samples from Iberian ibex (n = 181) were negative for C. spp. By direct plating, two wild boars out of 150 were positive for C. coli (1.3%, 95% CI 0.16-4.73), and one was positive for C. jejuni (0.67%, 95% CI 0.02-3.66). The latter was predominant in cattle: 5.45% (n = 55, 95% CI 1.14-5.12), while C. coli was not isolated from this host. C. lanienae was the most frequent species in wild boar at 10% (95% CI 5.7-15.96), and one cow cohabiting with positive wild boars in the same canyon also carried C. lanienae. Four enrichment protocols (using Bolton or Preston broth combined with either mCCDA or CFA) were added for 172 samples (57 from wild boars, 55 cattle and 60 Iberian ibexes) to increase the number of isolates obtained allowing the detection of statistically significant differences. The prevalence of C. lanienae was statistically significantly higher in wild boar than in cattle (P < 0.01), but the prevalence of C. jejuni was higher in the latter (P = 0.045). These results suggest that wild boar and cattle carry their own predominant Campylobacter species, while Iberian ibex do not seem to play an important role in the epidemiology of Campylobacter. However, there is a potential spill-over of C. spp., and thus, further research is needed to elucidate the factors determining inter-species transmission.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24595731     DOI: 10.1007/s10393-014-0921-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecohealth        ISSN: 1612-9202            Impact factor:   3.184


  43 in total

1.  Survey of Campylobacter species, VTEC O157 and Salmonella species in Swedish wildlife.

Authors:  H Wahlström; E Tysén; E Olsson Engvall; B Brändström; E Eriksson; T Mörner; I Vågsholm
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  2003-07-19       Impact factor: 2.695

2.  Using outbreak data for source attribution of human salmonellosis and campylobacteriosis in Europe.

Authors:  Sara Monteiro Pires; Håkan Vigre; Pia Makela; Tine Hald
Journal:  Foodborne Pathog Dis       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 3.171

3.  Evaluation of four protocols for the detection and isolation of thermophilic Campylobacter from different matrices.

Authors:  M Ugarte-Ruiz; S Gómez-Barrero; M C Porrero; J Alvarez; M García; M C Comerón; T M Wassenaar; L Domínguez
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 3.772

4.  Spatial distribution and registry-based case-control analysis of Campylobacter infections in Denmark, 1991-2001.

Authors:  Steen Ethelberg; Jacob Simonsen; Peter Gerner-Smidt; Katharina E P Olsen; Kåre Mølbak
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Zoonotic agents in small ruminants kept on city farms in southern Germany.

Authors:  Anna-Katarina Schilling; Helmut Hotzel; Ulrich Methner; Lisa D Sprague; Gernot Schmoock; Hosny El-Adawy; Ralf Ehricht; Anna-Caroline Wöhr; Michael Erhard; Lutz Geue
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  The effect of different isolation protocols on detection and molecular characterization of Campylobacter from poultry.

Authors:  M Ugarte-Ruiz; T M Wassenaar; S Gómez-Barrero; M C Porrero; N Navarro-Gonzalez; L Domínguez
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 2.858

7.  Evaluation of a Campylobacter fetus subspecies venerealis real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction for direct analysis of bovine preputial samples.

Authors:  Bonnie Chaban; Shirley Chu; Steven Hendrick; Cheryl Waldner; Janet E Hill
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.310

8.  Experimental infection of specific pathogen-free pigs with Campylobacter: excretion in faeces and transmission to non-inoculated pigs.

Authors:  Mily Leblanc Maridor; Martine Denis; Françoise Lalande; Bernard Beaurepaire; Roland Cariolet; Philippe Fravalo; Michel Federighi; Henri Seegers; Catherine Belloc
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2008-06-09       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Campylobacter populations in wild and domesticated Mallard ducks (Anas platyrhynchos).

Authors:  Frances M Colles; Jan S Ali; Samuel K Sheppard; Noel D McCarthy; Martin C J Maiden
Journal:  Environ Microbiol Rep       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.541

10.  Identifying the seasonal origins of human campylobacteriosis.

Authors:  N J C Strachan; O Rotariu; A Smith-Palmer; J Cowden; S K Sheppard; S J O'Brien; M C J Maiden; M Macrae; P R Bessell; L Matthews; S W J Reid; G T Innocent; I D Ogden; K J Forbes
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 4.434

View more
  5 in total

1.  First reported case of Campylobacter lanienae enteritis in a human.

Authors:  Simon Lévesque; Frédéric Lemay; Sadjia Bekal; Eric H Frost; Sophie Michaud
Journal:  JMM Case Rep       Date:  2016-06-28

2.  Agricultural intensification and the evolution of host specialism in the enteric pathogen Campylobacter jejuni.

Authors:  Evangelos Mourkas; Aidan J Taylor; Guillaume Méric; Sion C Bayliss; Ben Pascoe; Leonardos Mageiros; Jessica K Calland; Matthew D Hitchings; Anne Ridley; Ana Vidal; Ken J Forbes; Norval J C Strachan; Craig T Parker; Julian Parkhill; Keith A Jolley; Alison J Cody; Martin C J Maiden; David J Kelly; Samuel K Sheppard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Assessing the role of livestock and sympatric wild ruminants in spreading antimicrobial resistant Campylobacter and Salmonella in alpine ecosystems.

Authors:  Johan Espunyes; Oscar Cabezón; Andrea Dias-Alves; Pol Miralles; Teresa Ayats; Marta Cerdà-Cuéllar
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 2.741

4.  Comparative Genomic Analysis Identifies a Campylobacter Clade Deficient in Selenium Metabolism.

Authors:  William G Miller; Emma Yee; Bruno S Lopes; Mary H Chapman; Steven Huynh; James L Bono; Craig T Parker; Norval J C Strachan; Ken J Forbes
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 3.416

5.  Genotyping and Antibiotic Resistance Traits in Campylobacter jejuni and coli From Pigs and Wild Boars in Italy.

Authors:  Francesca Marotta; Lisa Di Marcantonio; Anna Janowicz; Francesca Pedonese; Guido Di Donato; Adrian Ardelean; Roberta Nuvoloni; Elisabetta Di Giannatale; Giuliano Garofolo
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 5.293

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.