Literature DB >> 16148580

Evaluation of tonometric correction factors.

Pinakin Gunvant1, Daniel James O'Leary, Mani Baskaran, David Charles Broadway, Russell Julian Watkins, Lingam Vijaya.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy of currently available correction factors in correcting intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements for the errors induced by the normal variations in corneal structural characteristics.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Central corneal thickness (CCT) and corneal radius of curvature were measured on 324 individuals (175 normal: group 1 and 149 had either open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension: group 2). IOP was measured in all normal subjects with the Goldmann applanation tonometer and the highest recorded IOP was obtained from patient charts for subjects with either open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Regression analysis was performed on IOP, CCT, and corneal radius of curvature. The corrected IOP was also calculated using the models proposed by Ehlers and Orssengo and Pye. Linear regression analysis was used to calculate the residual association between corneal parameters and corrected IOP.
RESULTS: There was a significant positive correlation between IOP measured using Goldmann applanation tonometer and the CCT in both groups. There was no significant correlation between corneal radius of curvature and IOP in either group. There was a significant negative correlation in both the groups between CCT and corrected IOP calculated using the models of Ehlers and Orssengo and Pye. This indicates that the Ehlers and Orssengo and Pye models may significantly overestimate the effect of CCT on IOP measurement.
CONCLUSION: The effect of CCT and IOP as observed in the present study and by other studies in literature is less than predicted by both the Ehlers formula and the Orssengo and Pye model. Correcting IOP for the effect of CCT using these models could be erroneous and lead to overcorrection of IOP, thus resulting in erroneously low corrected IOP eyes with thicker cornea and erroneously high corrected IOP in eyes with thinner cornea.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16148580     DOI: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000176940.81799.33

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Glaucoma        ISSN: 1057-0829            Impact factor:   2.503


  21 in total

1.  Correlations between corneal and optic nerve head variables in healthy subjects and patients with primary open angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Federico Saenz-Frances; Luis Jañez; Lara Borrego-Sanz; Clara Berrozpe-Villabona; Jose Maria Martinez-de-la-Casa; Laura Morales-Fernandez; Julian Garcia-Sanchez; Enrique Santos-Bueso; Julian Garcia-Feijoo
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Effects of central corneal thickness, central corneal power, and axial length on intraocular pressure measurement assessed with goldmann applanation tonometry.

Authors:  Fatih Özcura; Sayime Aydın; Nevin Uzgören
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  IOP measurement in silicone oil tamponade eyes by Corvis ST tonometer, Goldmann applanation tonometry and non-contact tonometry.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Lin Zheng; Ailing Bian; Qi Zhou
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  [Comparison of the iCare tonometer with the Goldmann tonometer in Malawi].

Authors:  J Hohmann; M Schulze-Schwering; T Chirambo Nyaka; V Moyo; P C Kayange; D Doycheva; N H Batumba; M S Spitzer
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Clinical evaluation of multiparameter correction equations for Goldmann applanation tonometry.

Authors:  P G Davey; A Elsheikh; D F Garway-Heath
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  [Evaluation of correction formulas for tonometry : The Goldmann applanation tonometry in approximation to dynamic contour tonometry].

Authors:  J Wachtl; M Töteberg-Harms; S Frimmel; C Kniestedt
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.059

7.  Dependence of dynamic contour and Goldmann applanation tonometries on peripheral corneal thickness.

Authors:  Federico Saenz-Frances; Claudia Sanz-Pozo; Lara Borrego-Sanz; Luis Jañez; Laura Morales-Fernandez; Jose Maria Martinez-de-la-Casa; Julian Garcia-Sanchez; Julian Garcia-Feijoo; Enrique Santos-Bueso
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

8.  Some dissociating factors in the analysis of structural and functional progressive damage in open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  C J W Hudson; L S Kim; S A Hancock; I A Cunliffe; J M Wild
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  [Methods of measuring intraocular pressure independently of central corneal thickness].

Authors:  A Hager; W Wiegand
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.059

10.  The effect of contact lens induced oedema on the accuracy of Goldmann tonometry in a mature population.

Authors:  K Hamilton; D Pye; S Hua; F Yu; J Chung; Q Hou
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 4.638

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.