Literature DB >> 16135037

Standard errors for attributable risk for simple and complex sample designs.

Barry I Graubard1, Thomas R Fears.   

Abstract

Adjusted attributable risk (AR) is the proportion of diseased individuals in a population that is due to an exposure. We consider estimates of adjusted AR based on odds ratios from logistic regression to adjust for confounding. Influence function methods used in survey sampling are applied to obtain simple and easily programmable expressions for estimating the variance of AR. These variance estimators can be applied to data from case-control, cross-sectional, and cohort studies with or without frequency or individual matching and for sample designs with subject samples that range from simple random samples to (sample) weighted multistage stratified cluster samples like those used in national household surveys. The variance estimation of AR is illustrated with: (i) a weighted stratified multistage clustered cross-sectional study of childhood asthma from the Third National Health and Examination Survey (NHANES III), and (ii) a frequency-matched case-control study of melanoma skin cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16135037     DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00355.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  30 in total

1.  Using adjusted relative risks to calculate attributable fractions.

Authors:  Katherine M Flegal; David F Williamson; Barry I Graubard
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-01-31       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Prevalence of refractive error in the United States, 1999-2004.

Authors:  Susan Vitale; Leon Ellwein; Mary Frances Cotch; Frederick L Ferris; Robert Sperduto
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-08

3.  Attributable fraction functions for censored event times.

Authors:  Li Chen; D Y Lin; Donglin Zeng
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 2.445

4.  Hypertension and risk of renal cell carcinoma among white and black Americans.

Authors:  Joanne S Colt; Kendra Schwartz; Barry I Graubard; Faith Davis; Julie Ruterbusch; Ralph DiGaetano; Mark Purdue; Nathaniel Rothman; Sholom Wacholder; Wong-Ho Chow
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.822

5.  Projecting individualized absolute invasive breast cancer risk in Asian and Pacific Islander American women.

Authors:  Rayna K Matsuno; Joseph P Costantino; Regina G Ziegler; Garnet L Anderson; Huilin Li; David Pee; Mitchell H Gail
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Variance computations for functional of absolute risk estimates.

Authors:  R M Pfeiffer; E Petracci
Journal:  Stat Probab Lett       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 0.870

7.  Model-Based Estimation of the Attributable Risk: A Loglinear Approach.

Authors:  Christopher Cox; Xiuhong Li
Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 1.681

8.  Population-based absolute risk estimation with survey data.

Authors:  Stephanie A Kovalchik; Ruth M Pfeiffer
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 1.588

9.  Body mass index and renal cell cancer: the influence of race and sex.

Authors:  Jennifer L Beebe-Dimmer; Joanne S Colt; Julie J Ruterbusch; Gregory R Keele; Mark P Purdue; Sholom Wacholder; Barry I Graubard; Faith Davis; Wong-Ho Chow; Kendra L Schwartz
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.822

10.  Combined impact of lifestyle factors on mortality: prospective cohort study in US women.

Authors:  Rob M van Dam; Tricia Li; Donna Spiegelman; Oscar H Franco; Frank B Hu
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-09-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.