Literature DB >> 23049150

Model-Based Estimation of the Attributable Risk: A Loglinear Approach.

Christopher Cox1, Xiuhong Li.   

Abstract

This paper considers model-based methods for estimation of the adjusted attributable risk (AR) in both case-control and cohort studies. An earlier review discussed approaches for both types of studies, using the standard logistic regression model for case-control studies, and for cohort studies proposing the equivalent Poisson model in order to account for the additional variability in estimating the distribution of exposures and covariates from the data. In this paper we revisit case-control studies, arguing for the equivalent Poisson model in this case as well. Using the delta method with the Poisson model, we provide general expressions for the asymptotic variance of the AR for both types of studies. This includes the generalized AR, which extends the original idea of attributable risk to the case where the exposure is not completely eliminated. These variance expressions can be easily programmed in any statistical package that includes Poisson regression and has capabilities for simple matrix algebra. In addition, we discuss computation of standard errors and confidence limits using bootstrap resampling. For cohort studies, use of the bootstrap allows binary regression models with link functions other than the logit.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 23049150      PMCID: PMC3462467          DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2012.04.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal        ISSN: 0167-9473            Impact factor:   1.681


  15 in total

1.  The estimation and interpretation of attributable risk in health research.

Authors:  S D Walter
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Variance calculations and confidence intervals for estimates of the attributable risk based on logistic models.

Authors:  J Benichou; M H Gail
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Standard errors for attributable risk for simple and complex sample designs.

Authors:  Barry I Graubard; Thomas R Fears
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Model-based estimation of the attributable risk in case-control and cohort studies.

Authors:  Christopher Cox
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.021

5.  Average attributable fractions: a coherent theory for apportioning excess risk to individual risk factors and subpopulations.

Authors:  Geir Egil Eide; Ivar Heuch
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.207

6.  Comparison of confidence intervals for adjusted attributable risk estimates under multinomial sampling.

Authors:  Andrea Lehnert-Batar; Annette Pfahlberg; Olaf Gefeller
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.207

7.  Model-based estimation of population attributable risk under cross-sectional sampling.

Authors:  S Basu; J R Landis
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1995-12-15       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Estimating the generalized impact fraction from case-control data.

Authors:  K Drescher; H Becher
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Maximum likelihood estimation of the attributable fraction from logistic models.

Authors:  S Greenland; K Drescher
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Specific sex drug combinations contribute to the majority of recent HIV seroconversions among MSM in the MACS.

Authors:  David G Ostrow; Michael W Plankey; Christopher Cox; Xiuhong Li; Steven Shoptaw; Lisa P Jacobson; Ronald C Stall
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 3.731

View more
  5 in total

1.  Investigate the complexities of environmental determinants of sleep health disparities.

Authors:  Dana M Alhasan; Symielle A Gaston; Chandra L Jackson
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 6.313

2.  Prevalence and correlates of suicidal behavior among soldiers: results from the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers (Army STARRS).

Authors:  Matthew K Nock; Murray B Stein; Steven G Heeringa; Robert J Ursano; Lisa J Colpe; Carol S Fullerton; Irving Hwang; James A Naifeh; Nancy A Sampson; Michael Schoenbaum; Alan M Zaslavsky; Ronald C Kessler
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 21.596

3.  Thirty-day prevalence of DSM-IV mental disorders among nondeployed soldiers in the US Army: results from the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers (Army STARRS).

Authors:  Ronald C Kessler; Steven G Heeringa; Murray B Stein; Lisa J Colpe; Carol S Fullerton; Irving Hwang; James A Naifeh; Matthew K Nock; Maria Petukhova; Nancy A Sampson; Michael Schoenbaum; Alan M Zaslavsky; Robert J Ursano
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 21.596

4.  Attributable risk from distributed lag models.

Authors:  Antonio Gasparrini; Michela Leone
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Emergency department personnel patient care-related COVID-19 risk.

Authors:  Nicholas M Mohr; Anusha Krishnadasan; Karisa K Harland; Patrick Ten Eyck; William R Mower; Walter A Schrading; Juan Carlos C Montoy; L Clifford McDonald; Preeta K Kutty; Elisabeth Hesse; Scott Santibanez; David N Weissman; Patricia Slev; David A Talan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 3.752

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.