Literature DB >> 18695106

Prevalence of refractive error in the United States, 1999-2004.

Susan Vitale1, Leon Ellwein, Mary Frances Cotch, Frederick L Ferris, Robert Sperduto.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the prevalence of refractive error in the United States.
METHODS: The 1999-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) used an autorefractor to obtain refractive error data on a nationally representative sample of the US noninstitutionalized, civilian population 12 years and older. Using data from the eye with a greater absolute spherical equivalent (SphEq) value, we defined clinically important refractive error as follows: hyperopia, SphEq value of 3.0 diopters (D) or greater; myopia, SphEq value of -1.0 D or less; and astigmatism, cylinder of 1.0 D or greater in either eye.
RESULTS: Of 14,213 participants 20 years or older who completed the NHANES, refractive error data were obtained for 12,010 (84.5%). The age-standardized prevalences of hyperopia, myopia, and astigmatism were 3.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.2%-4.0%), 33.1% (95% CI, 31.5%-34.7%), and 36.2% (95% CI, 34.9%-37.5%), respectively. Myopia was more prevalent in women (39.9%) than in men (32.6%) (P < .001) among 20- to 39-year-old participants. Persons 60 years or older were less likely to have myopia and more likely to have hyperopia and/or astigmatism than younger persons. Myopia was more common in non-Hispanic whites (35.2%) than in non-Hispanic blacks (28.6%) or Mexican Americans (25.1%) (P < .001 for both).
CONCLUSION: Estimates based on the 1999-2004 NHANES vision examination data indicate that clinically important refractive error affects half of the US population 20 years or older.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18695106      PMCID: PMC2772054          DOI: 10.1001/archopht.126.8.1111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0003-9950


  33 in total

1.  Model-based small area estimates of overweight prevalence using sample selection adjustment.

Authors:  D Malec; W W Davis; X Cao
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1999-12-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Age-related decreases in the prevalence of myopia: longitudinal change or cohort effect?

Authors:  D O Mutti; K Zadnik
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Prevalence and risk factors for refractive errors in adult Chinese in Singapore.

Authors:  T Y Wong; P J Foster; J Hee; T P Ng; J M Tielsch; S J Chew; G J Johnson; S K Seah
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Relationship between refraction and prevalent as well as incident age-related maculopathy: the Rotterdam Study.

Authors:  M Kamran Ikram; Redmer van Leeuwen; Johannes R Vingerling; Albert Hofman; Paulus T V M de Jong
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  The increasing prevalence of myopia: implications for Australia.

Authors:  K Rose; W Smith; I Morgan; P Mitchell
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.207

6.  Myopia and incident cataract and cataract surgery: the blue mountains eye study.

Authors:  Christine Younan; Paul Mitchell; Robert G Cumming; Elena Rochtchina; Jie Jin Wang
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Blindness, visual impairment and the problem of uncorrected refractive error in a Mexican-American population: Proyecto VER.

Authors:  Beatriz Muñoz; Sheila K West; Jorge Rodriguez; Rosario Sanchez; Aimee T Broman; Robert Snyder; Ronald Klein
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Causes of blindness and visual impairment in a population of older Americans: The Salisbury Eye Evaluation Study.

Authors:  B Muñoz; S K West; G S Rubin; O D Schein; H A Quigley; S B Bressler; K Bandeen-Roche
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-06

9.  Effect of refractive error correction on health-related quality of life and depression in older nursing home residents.

Authors:  Cynthia Owsley; Gerald McGwin; Kay Scilley; G Christine Meek; Deidre Seker; Allison Dyer
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-11

10.  Impact of bilateral visual impairment on health-related quality of life: the Blue Mountains Eye Study.

Authors:  Ee-Munn Chia; Jie Jin Wang; Elena Rochtchina; Wayne Smith; Robert R Cumming; Paul Mitchell
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  169 in total

1.  Protective effects of high ambient lighting on the development of form-deprivation myopia in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Earl L Smith; Li-Fang Hung; Juan Huang
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  A qualitative investigation of visual tasks with which to assess distance-specific visual function.

Authors:  Mark J Atkinson; Steven Tally; Chris W Heichel; Igor Kozak; Jennifer Leich; Ashley Levack
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Muller glia, vision-guided ocular growth, retinal stem cells, and a little serendipity: the Cogan lecture.

Authors:  Andy J Fischer
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Prediction of Juvenile-Onset Myopia.

Authors:  Karla Zadnik; Loraine T Sinnott; Susan A Cotter; Lisa A Jones-Jordan; Robert N Kleinstein; Ruth E Manny; J Daniel Twelker; Donald O Mutti
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 7.389

5.  Myopia prevalence in Canadian school children: a pilot study.

Authors:  Mike Yang; Doerte Luensmann; Desmond Fonn; Jill Woods; Debbie Jones; Keith Gordon; Lyndon Jones
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Objectively Measured Light Exposure During School and Summer in Children.

Authors:  Lisa A Ostrin; Auzita Sajjadi; Julia S Benoit
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  Optical coherence tomography accurately measures corneal power change from laser refractive surgery.

Authors:  Ryan P McNabb; Sina Farsiu; Sandra S Stinnett; Joseph A Izatt; Anthony N Kuo
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Racial variations in the prevalence of refractive errors in the United States: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Chen-Wei Pan; Barbara E K Klein; Mary Frances Cotch; Sandi Shrager; Ronald Klein; Aaron Folsom; Richard Kronmal; Steven J Shea; Gregory L Burke; Seang-Mei Saw; Tien Y Wong
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 5.258

9.  Peripheral optics with bifocal soft and corneal reshaping contact lenses.

Authors:  Anita Ticak; Jeffrey J Walline
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  Predictors of Spectacle Wear and Reasons for Nonwear in Students Randomized to Ready-made or Custom-made Spectacles: Results of Secondary Objectives From a Randomized Noninferiority Trial.

Authors:  Priya Morjaria; Jennifer Evans; Clare Gilbert
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 7.389

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.