Literature DB >> 16118812

Sample size for a two-group comparison of repeated binary measurements using GEE.

Sin-Ho Jung1, Chul W Ahn.   

Abstract

Controlled clinical trials often randomize subjects to two treatment groups and repeatedly evaluate them at baseline and intervals across a treatment period of fixed duration. A popular primary objective in these trials is to compare the change rates in the repeated measurements between treatment groups. Repeated measurements usually involve missing data and a serial correlation within each subject. The generalized estimating equation (GEE) method has been widely used to fit the time trend in repeated measurements because of its robustness to random missing and mispecification of the true correlation structure. In this paper, we propose a closed form sample size formula for comparing the change rates of binary repeated measurements using GEE for a two-group comparison. The sample size formula is derived incorporating missing patterns, such as independent missing and monotone missing, and correlation structures, such as AR(1) model. We also propose an algorithm to generate correlated binary data with arbitrary marginal means and a Markov dependency and use it in simulation studies. Copyright (c) 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16118812     DOI: 10.1002/sim.2136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  11 in total

1.  Sample size/power calculations for repeated ordinal measurements in population pharmacodynamic experiments.

Authors:  Kayode Ogungbenro; Leon Aarons
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 2.745

2.  Small sample performance of bias-corrected sandwich estimators for cluster-randomized trials with binary outcomes.

Authors:  Peng Li; David T Redden
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Sample size requirements for detecting treatment effect heterogeneity in cluster randomized trials.

Authors:  Siyun Yang; Fan Li; Monique A Starks; Adrian F Hernandez; Robert J Mentz; Kingshuk R Choudhury
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Sample Size Calculations for Time-Averaged Difference of Longitudinal Binary Outcomes.

Authors:  Ying Lou; Jing Cao; Song Zhang; Chul Ahn
Journal:  Commun Stat Theory Methods       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 0.893

5.  A comparison of power analysis methods for evaluating effects of a predictor on slopes in longitudinal designs with missing data.

Authors:  Cuiling Wang; Charles B Hall; Mimi Kim
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 3.021

6.  Sample size calculation in hierarchical 2 × 2 factorial trials with unequal cluster sizes.

Authors:  Zizhong Tian; Denise Esserman; Guangyu Tong; Ondrej Blaha; James Dziura; Peter Peduzzi; Fan Li
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2022-01-02       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  A GEE Approach to Determine Sample Size for Pre- and Post-Intervention Experiments with Dropout.

Authors:  Song Zhang; Jing Cao; Chul Ahn
Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.681

8.  Sample size considerations for split-mouth design.

Authors:  Hong Zhu; Song Zhang; Chul Ahn
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 3.021

9.  Sample size calculation for before-after experiments with partially overlapping cohorts.

Authors:  Song Zhang; Jing Cao; Chul Ahn
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 2.226

10.  Power and Sample Size Calculations for Generalized Estimating Equations via Local Asymptotics.

Authors:  Zhigang Li; Ian W McKeague
Journal:  Stat Sin       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 1.261

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.