Literature DB >> 26303156

Sample size considerations for split-mouth design.

Hong Zhu1, Song Zhang1, Chul Ahn1.   

Abstract

Split-mouth designs are frequently used in dental clinical research, where a mouth is divided into two or more experimental segments that are randomly assigned to different treatments. It has the distinct advantage of removing a lot of inter-subject variability from the estimated treatment effect. Methods of statistical analyses for split-mouth design have been well developed. However, little work is available on sample size consideration at the design phase of a split-mouth trial, although many researchers pointed out that the split-mouth design can only be more efficient than a parallel-group design when within-subject correlation coefficient is substantial. In this paper, we propose to use the generalized estimating equation (GEE) approach to assess treatment effect in split-mouth trials, accounting for correlations among observations. Closed-form sample size formulas are introduced for the split-mouth design with continuous and binary outcomes, assuming exchangeable and "nested exchangeable" correlation structures for outcomes from the same subject. The statistical inference is based on the large sample approximation under the GEE approach. Simulation studies are conducted to investigate the finite-sample performance of the GEE sample size formulas. A dental clinical trial example is presented for illustration.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Continuous and binary outcomes; dental clinical trial; generalized estimating equation; sample size; split-mouth

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26303156      PMCID: PMC5573650          DOI: 10.1177/0962280215601137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res        ISSN: 0962-2802            Impact factor:   3.021


  15 in total

1.  Sample size estimation for GEE method for comparing slopes in repeated measurements data.

Authors:  Sin-Ho Jung; Chul Ahn
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2003-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Sample calculation for split-mouth designs.

Authors:  Nikolaos Pandis
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Methods for the statistical analysis of binary data in split-cluster designs.

Authors:  Allan Donner; Neil Klar; Guangyong Zou
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Sample size for a two-group comparison of repeated binary measurements using GEE.

Authors:  Sin-Ho Jung; Chul W Ahn
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Methods for the statistical analysis of binary data in split-mouth designs with baseline measurements.

Authors:  A Donner; G Y Zou
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  On the comparison of correlated proportions for clustered data.

Authors:  N A Obuchowski
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-07-15       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Sample size calculations for studies with correlated observations.

Authors:  G Liu; K Y Liang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Comparison of endovenous radiofrequency versus 810 nm diode laser occlusion of large veins in an animal model.

Authors:  Robert A Weiss
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.398

9.  Sample size calculation for time-averaged differences in the presence of missing data.

Authors:  Song Zhang; Chul Ahn
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 10.  Understanding and evaluating clinical trials.

Authors:  M Bigby; A S Gadenne
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 11.527

View more
  9 in total

1.  A randomized clinical trial of class II composite restorations using direct and semidirect techniques.

Authors:  Carlos Rocha Gomes Torres; Mariane Cintra Mailart; Érica Crastechini; Fernanda Alves Feitosa; Stella Renato Machado Esteves; Rebeca Di Nicoló; Alessandra Bühler Borges
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Comparison of cytokine level changes in gingival crevicular fluid between the aligner and pendulum appliance during early molar distalization : A single-center, prospective, observational study.

Authors:  Huijuan Chen; Liuhui Liu; Yuan Li; Lingyun Guo; Dongmei Sun
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Comparison of the C-Reactive Protein Level and Visual Analog Scale Scores between Piezosurgery and Rotatory Osteotomy in Mandibular Impacted Third Molar Extraction.

Authors:  Lakshmi Shetty; Khushal Gangwani; Uday Londhe; Swati Bharadwaj; Mohammed Mousa H Bakri; Ahmed Alamoudi; Rodolfo Reda; Shilpa Bhandi; A Thirumal Raj; Shankargouda Patil; Luca Testarelli
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-20

4.  Randomized prospective clinical trial of class II restorations using flowable bulk-fill resin composites: 4-year follow-up.

Authors:  Isis Almela Endo Hoshino; André Luiz Fraga Briso; Lara Maria Bueno Esteves; Paulo Henrique Dos Santos; Sandra Meira Borghi Frascino; Ticiane Cestari Fagundes
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 3.606

5.  Comparison of Piezosurgery and Conventional Rotary Instruments for Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: A Randomized Controlled Clinical and Radiographic Trial.

Authors:  Hani Arakji; Mohamed Shokry; Nayer Aboelsaad
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2016-08-14

6.  Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Diode Laser and Clinpro XT Varnish for Treatment of Dentin Hypersensitivity: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Bhavika Alpesh Bhavsar; Michelle Vaz; Kamei Neilalung; Tanisha Das; Swarnaditya Majumdar; Jagriti Talukdar
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2020-11-24

7.  Taking 200 mg Vitamin C Three Times per Day Improved Extraction Socket Wound Healing Parameters: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Nanthanut Pisalsitsakul; Chaiwat Pinnoi; Narueporn Sutanthavibul; Paksinee Kamolratanakul
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2022-03-10

Review 8.  Pit and Fissure Sealant versus Fluoride Varnish for the Prevention of Dental Caries in School Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Tasneem Rashed; Nura Alkhalefa; Alaa Adam; Abdulaziz AlKheraif
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 3.149

9.  Sample size considerations for matched-pair cluster randomization design with incomplete observations of continuous outcomes.

Authors:  Xiaohan Xu; Hong Zhu; Chul Ahn
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 2.226

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.