Literature DB >> 24293779

A GEE Approach to Determine Sample Size for Pre- and Post-Intervention Experiments with Dropout.

Song Zhang1, Jing Cao, Chul Ahn.   

Abstract

Pre- and post-intervention experiments are widely used in medical and social behavioral studies, where each subject is supposed to contribute a pair of observations. In this paper we investigate sample size requirement for a scenario frequently encountered by practitioners: All enrolled subjects participate in the pre-intervention phase of study, but some of them will drop out due to various reasons, thus resulting in missing values in the post-intervention measurements. Traditional sample size calculation based on the McNemar's test could not accommodate missing data. Through the GEE approach, we derive a closed-form sample size formula that properly accounts for the impact of partial observations. We demonstrate that when there is no missing data, the proposed sample size estimate under the GEE approach is very close to that under the McNemar's test. When there is missing data, the proposed method can lead to substantial saving in sample size. Simulation studies and an example are presented.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 24293779      PMCID: PMC3842849          DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2013.07.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal        ISSN: 0167-9473            Impact factor:   1.681


  22 in total

1.  Sample size and power for McNemar's test with clustered data.

Authors:  Mithat Gönen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-07-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Sample size for a two-group comparison of repeated binary measurements using GEE.

Authors:  Sin-Ho Jung; Chul W Ahn
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  The comparison of percentages in matched samples.

Authors:  W G COCHRAN
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  1950-12       Impact factor: 2.445

4.  Application of GEE procedures for sample size calculations in repeated measures experiments.

Authors:  J Rochon
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-07-30       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  APPROXIMATING POWER OF THE UNCONDITIONAL TEST FOR CORRELATED BINARY PAIRS.

Authors:  Grace R Selicato; Keith E Muller
Journal:  Commun Stat Simul Comput       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.118

6.  Models for longitudinal data: a generalized estimating equation approach.

Authors:  S L Zeger; K Y Liang; P S Albert
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  The matched pairs design in the case of all-or-none responses.

Authors:  O S Miettinen
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1968-06       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Sample size for testing differences in proportions for the paired-sample design.

Authors:  R J Connor
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Improving care for patients with dementia hospitalized for acute somatic illness in a specialized care unit: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Tania Zieschang; Ilona Dutzi; Elke Müller; Ute Hestermann; Katinka Grünendahl; Anke Karin Braun; Daniel Hüger; Daniel Kopf; Norbert Specht-Leible; Peter Oster
Journal:  Int Psychogeriatr       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 3.878

10.  The effect of digital cervical examination on group B streptococcal culture.

Authors:  Eric J Knudtson; Landon B Lorenz; Valerie J Skaggs; Jennifer D Peck; Jean R Goodman; Andrew A Elimian
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-10-04       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  6 in total

1.  Sample size determination for a matched-pairs study with incomplete data using exact approach.

Authors:  Guogen Shan; Charles Bernick; Sarah Banks
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  Sample size calculation for before-after experiments with partially overlapping cohorts.

Authors:  Song Zhang; Jing Cao; Chul Ahn
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 3.  Sample size considerations for comparing dynamic treatment regimens in a sequential multiple-assignment randomized trial with a continuous longitudinal outcome.

Authors:  Nicholas J Seewald; Kelley M Kidwell; Inbal Nahum-Shani; Tianshuang Wu; James R McKay; Daniel Almirall
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 3.021

4.  Effects of a 9-month resistance training intervention on quality of life, sense of coherence, and depressive symptoms in older adults: randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Tiia Kekäläinen; Katja Kokko; Sarianna Sipilä; Simon Walker
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Parenterally Administered Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus-Like Particle-Based Vaccine Formulated with CCL25/28 Chemokines Induces Systemic and Mucosal Immune Protectivity in Pigs.

Authors:  Chin-Wei Hsu; Ming-Hao Chang; Hui-Wen Chang; Tzong-Yuan Wu; Yen-Chen Chang
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 5.048

6.  Effects of an Individualized Active Aging Counseling Intervention on Mobility and Physical Activity: Secondary Analyses of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Sini Siltanen; Erja Portegijs; Katja Pynnönen; Mary Hassandra; Timo Rantalainen; Laura Karavirta; Milla J Saajanaho; Taina Rantanen
Journal:  J Aging Health       Date:  2020-06-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.