Literature DB >> 26416696

Sample size calculation for before-after experiments with partially overlapping cohorts.

Song Zhang1, Jing Cao2, Chul Ahn3.   

Abstract

We investigate sample size calculation for before-after experiments where the outcome of interest is binary and the enrolled subjects contribute a mixed type of data: some subjects contribute complete pairs of before- and after-intervention outcomes, while some subjects contribute incomplete data (before-intervention only or after-intervention only). We use the GEE approach to derive a closed-form sample size formula by treating the incomplete observations as missing data in a generalized linear model. The impacts of various designing factors are appropriately accounted for in the sample size formula, including intervention effect, baseline response rate, within-subject correlation, and distribution of missing values in the before- and after-intervention periods. We illustrate sample size estimation using a real application example. We conduct simulation studies to demonstrate that the proposed sample size maintains the nominal power and type I error under a wide spectrum of trial configurations.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Before–after study; Binary outcome; Clinical trial; Experimental design; Sample size

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26416696      PMCID: PMC4809790          DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.09.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  18 in total

1.  Sample size and power calculations with correlated binary data.

Authors:  W Pan
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2001-06

2.  Sample size for a two-group comparison of repeated binary measurements using GEE.

Authors:  Sin-Ho Jung; Chul W Ahn
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Exact and approximate unconditional confidence intervals for proportion difference in the presence of incomplete data.

Authors:  Man-Lai Tang; Man-Ho Ling; Guo-Liang Tian
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-02-15       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  The comparison of percentages in matched samples.

Authors:  W G COCHRAN
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  1950-12       Impact factor: 2.445

5.  Analysis of prevention program effectiveness with clustered data using generalized estimating equations.

Authors:  E C Norton; G S Bieler; S T Ennett; G A Zarkin
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1996-10

6.  Sample size calculations for studies with correlated observations.

Authors:  G Liu; K Y Liang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  The matched pairs design in the case of all-or-none responses.

Authors:  O S Miettinen
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1968-06       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Sample size for testing differences in proportions for the paired-sample design.

Authors:  R J Connor
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Sample size calculation for time-averaged differences in the presence of missing data.

Authors:  Song Zhang; Chul Ahn
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.226

10.  Retrospective study on PET-SPECT imaging in a large cohort of myotonic dystrophy type 1 patients.

Authors:  Vincenzo Romeo; E Pegoraro; F Squarzanti; G Sorarù; C Ferrati; M Ermani; P Zucchetta; F Chierichetti; C Angelini
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 3.307

View more
  2 in total

1.  Sample size determination for a matched-pairs study with incomplete data using exact approach.

Authors:  Guogen Shan; Charles Bernick; Sarah Banks
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  Sample size considerations for matched-pair cluster randomization design with incomplete observations of continuous outcomes.

Authors:  Xiaohan Xu; Hong Zhu; Chul Ahn
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 2.226

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.