Literature DB >> 7964772

Clinical and radiographic evaluation of long-stem femoral components following revision total hip arthroplasty.

J B Meding1, M A Ritter, E M Keating, P M Faris.   

Abstract

Fifty-four consecutive, long-stem revision hip arthroplasties were performed in 53 patients. In order to evaluate periprosthetic femoral changes, all cases utilizing cement, requiring bone-grafts for prosthetic stability, or with a follow-up period of less than 2 years were omitted. Thus, 32 long-stem revision hip arthroplasties in 32 patients were reviewed. Twenty-three Porous Coated Anatomic (Howmedica, Rutherford, NJ) and nine Bi-Metric (Biomet, Warsaw, IN) stems were implanted, with an average follow-up period of 3.6 years (range, 2-6 years). Prosthetic canal fill averaged 94% proximally and 80% distally. Intraoperative complications included three femoral shaft fractures. Harris hip scores averaged 47.8 points, before surgery and 87.6 points at the final follow-up evaluation, with 81% of patients the pain-free. Only three cases of subsidence and one case of osteolysis were noted. By 1 year, proximal osteopenia (off-load) (P = .005), bony condensation about the porous surface (spot weld) (P = .01), and pedestal formation (P = .004) were observed. The presence of distal cortical hypertrophy, (P = .02) spot weld (P = .001), and pedestal formation (P = .05) correlated significantly with off-load. Pedestal formation and distal cortical hypertrophy were commonly found together (P = .001). Despite significant periprosthetic remodeling, adequate fixation and satisfactory early clinical scores were achieved in this setting. Contrary to similar reviews using extensive bone-grafts, acceptable pain-free clinical results were obtained with these components.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7964772     DOI: 10.1016/0883-5403(94)90051-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  7 in total

1.  Isolated acetabular revision after total hip arthroplasty: results at 5-9 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Xiao-Dong Chen; James P Waddell; Jane Morton; Emil H Schemitsch
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2005-08-11       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Promising mid-term results of total hip arthroplasties using an uncemented lateral-flare hip prosthesis: a clinical and radiographic study.

Authors:  Alex Leali; Joseph Fetto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Survival of the cementless Spotorno stem in the second decade.

Authors:  Peter R Aldinger; Alexander W Jung; Steffen J Breusch; Volker Ewerbeck; Dominik Parsch
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Digital tomosynthesis with metal artifact reduction for assessing cementless hip arthroplasty: a diagnostic cohort study of 48 patients.

Authors:  Hao Tang; Dejin Yang; Shengjie Guo; Jing Tang; Jian Liu; Dacheng Wang; Yixin Zhou
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Evaluation of peri-prosthetic radiolucent lines surrounding the cementless femoral stem using digital tomosynthesis with metal artifact reduction: a cadaveric study in comparison with radiography and computed tomography.

Authors:  Hao Tang; Xingjian Huang; Xiaoguang Cheng; Dejin Yang; Yong Huang; Yixin Zhou
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2020-09

6.  EBRA Migration Analysis of a Modular, Distally Fixed Stem in Hip Revision Arthroplasty: A Clinical and Radiological Study.

Authors:  Philipp Blum; David Putzer; Johannes Neugebauer; Markus Neubauer; Markus Süß; Dietmar Dammerer
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 4.964

7.  Prospective five-year subsidence analysis of a cementless fully hydroxyapatite-coated femoral hip arthroplasty component.

Authors:  Martin Clauss; Catherine Van Der Straeten; Marc Goossens
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 2.135

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.