Literature DB >> 16094273

Can vertebroplasty restore normal load-bearing to fractured vertebrae?

Najma Farooq1, Jonathan C Park, Phillip Pollintine, Deborah J Annesley-Williams, Patricia Dolan.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Cadaver motion segments were used to evaluate the effects of vertebroplasty on spinal loading following vertebral fracture.
OBJECTIVES: To determine if vertebroplasty reverses fracture-induced changes in the distribution of compressive stress in cadaver motion segments. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Vertebroplasty involves reinforcement of vertebrae by injection of cement and is now being used increasingly to treat osteoporotic vertebral fractures. However, its effects on spinal load-bearing are largely unknown. We hypothesize that vertebroplasty, following vertebral fracture, helps to equalize stress acting on the intervertebral disc and adjacent vertebral bodies.
METHODS: Nineteen cadaver thoracolumbar motion segments (age 64-90 years) were induced to fracture by compressive overload. Specimens were then subjected to vertebroplasty, and subsequently creep loaded for 1 hour at 1.5 kN. The compressive stress acting on the intervertebral disc was measured before and after fracture, after vertebroplasty, and after creep, by pulling a pressure transducer mounted in a 1.3-mm needle across the disc's midsagittal diameter. This information was then used to calculate neural arch load-bearing. At each time point, measurements were also made of compressive stiffness.
RESULTS: Vertebral fracture reduced motion segment compressive stiffness, decompressed the adjacent nucleus, increased stress concentrations in the posterior anulus, and increased neural arch load-bearing, all by a significant amount. Vertebroplasty partially, but significantly, reversed all of these fracture-induced changes.
CONCLUSIONS: Vertebroplasty reduces stress concentrations in the anulus and neural arch resulting in a more even distribution of compressive stress on the intervertebral disc and adjacent vertebral bodies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16094273     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000171906.01906.07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  15 in total

Review 1.  Kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty: how good is the evidence?

Authors:  Fergus E McKiernan
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 2.  [Stabilization of the osteoporotic spine from a biomechanical viewpoint].

Authors:  C-E Heyde; A Rohlmann; U Weber; R Kayser
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  The effect of osteoporotic vertebral fracture on predicted spinal loads in vivo.

Authors:  Andrew M Briggs; Tim V Wrigley; Jaap H van Dieën; Bev Phillips; Sing Kai Lo; Alison M Greig; Kim L Bennell
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  [Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty in patients with osteoporotic fractures: secured knowledge and open questions].

Authors:  K Bohndorf; R Fessl
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Micromechanics of the human vertebral body for forward flexion.

Authors:  Haisheng Yang; Shashank Nawathe; Aaron J Fields; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-06-16       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Relationship between New Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture and Instrumented Lumbar Arthrodesis.

Authors:  Bung-Hak Kim; Dong-Hyuk Choi; Seong-Hun Jeon; Yong-Soo Choi
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2010-11-24

7.  Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty Can Restore Normal Spine Mechanics following Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture.

Authors:  Jin Luo; Michael A Adams; Patricia Dolan
Journal:  J Osteoporos       Date:  2010-06-20

Review 8.  [Treatment options for problematic thoracic and lumbar osteoporotic fractures].

Authors:  C E Heyde; Z Fekete; Y Robinson; S K Tschöke; R Kayser
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Altered disc pressure profile after an osteoporotic vertebral fracture is a risk factor for adjacent vertebral body fracture.

Authors:  Michael N Tzermiadianos; Susan M Renner; Frank M Phillips; Alexander G Hadjipavlou; Michael R Zindrick; Robert M Havey; Michael Voronov; Avinash G Patwardhan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Effective modulus of the human intervertebral disc and its effect on vertebral bone stress.

Authors:  Haisheng Yang; Michael G Jekir; Maxwell W Davis; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.