Literature DB >> 16094101

A model for cochlear implant electrode insertion and force evaluation: results with a new electrode design and insertion technique.

J Thomas Roland1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES AND HYPOTHESIS: This study has the specific aim of evaluating the insertion characteristics of a new cochlear implant electrode. Techniques for evaluation of fluoroscopic real time mechanical insertion dynamics, histologic electrode position and trauma results, hydraulic force, and mechanical insertion forces are presented. In addition, this study should serve to present a novel model for cochlear implant electrode insertion evaluations. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective analysis using a series of analytical techniques.
METHODS: All studies are conducted in fixed cadaveric temporal bones. Real time fluoroscopic insertion evaluations, histologic evaluations for trauma and electrode position in embedded bones, hydraulic measures, and mechanical intracochlear force measurements are conducted with a current and new electrode.
RESULTS: The Contour Advance electrode provides a more reliable and less traumatic insertion when deployed with the Advance Off Stylet technique. This is largely because of a reduction in intracochlear outer wall force generation. Fluoroscopic and histologic analysis reveal a smooth insertion without reliance on cochlear outer wall contact. No hydraulic forces were detected when measured from the superior semicircular canal ampulla.
CONCLUSION: The model used for this study provides valuable information to cochlear implant surgeons and design engineers. The Contour Advance electrode, inserted with the Advance Off Stylet technique, represents an improvement over the Contour electrode inserted with the standard insertion technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16094101     DOI: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000167993.05007.35

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  36 in total

Review 1.  The development of the Nucleus Freedom Cochlear implant system.

Authors:  James F Patrick; Peter A Busby; Peter J Gibson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-12

Review 2.  Soft cochlear implantation: rationale for the surgical approach.

Authors:  David R Friedland; Christina Runge-Samuelson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2009-06

3.  An automated insertion tool for cochlear implants with integrated force sensing capability.

Authors:  Jan-Philipp Kobler; Daniel Beckmann; Thomas S Rau; Omid Majdani; Tobias Ortmaier
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Automated insertion of preformed cochlear implant electrodes: evaluation of curling behaviour and insertion forces on an artificial cochlear model.

Authors:  Thomas S Rau; Andreas Hussong; Martin Leinung; Thomas Lenarz; Omid Majdani
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Impact of electrode design and surgical approach on scalar location and cochlear implant outcomes.

Authors:  George B Wanna; Jack H Noble; Matthew L Carlson; René H Gifford; Mary S Dietrich; David S Haynes; Benoit M Dawant; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  The development of neural stimulators: a review of preclinical safety and efficacy studies.

Authors:  Robert K Shepherd; Joel Villalobos; Owen Burns; David A X Nayagam
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 5.379

7.  Factors Affecting Outcomes in Cochlear Implant Recipients Implanted With a Perimodiolar Electrode Array Located in Scala Tympani.

Authors:  Laura K Holden; Jill B Firszt; Ruth M Reeder; Rosalie M Uchanski; Noël Y Dwyer; Timothy A Holden
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Intracochlear Pressure Transients During Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion.

Authors:  Nathaniel T Greene; Jameson K Mattingly; Renee M Banakis Hartl; Daniel J Tollin; Stephen P Cass
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Role of electrode placement as a contributor to variability in cochlear implant outcomes.

Authors:  Charles C Finley; Timothy A Holden; Laura K Holden; Bruce R Whiting; Richard A Chole; Gail J Neely; Timothy E Hullar; Margaret W Skinner
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Forces and trauma associated with minimally invasive image-guided cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Pooyan Rohani; Jason Pile; Lueder A Kahrs; Ramya Balachandran; Grégoire S Blachon; Nabil Simaan; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 3.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.