PURPOSE: Minimally invasive cochlear implantation and residual hearing preservation require both the surgical approach to the cochlea as well as the implant insertion to be performed in an atraumatic fashion. Considering the geometric limitations of this approach, specialized instrumentation is required to insert the electrode while preserving intracochlear membranes carrying the sensory hair cells. METHODS: An automated insertion tool for cochlear implants, which is capable of sensing insertion forces with a theoretical resolution of 30 μN, is presented. In contrast to previous designs, the custom force sensor is integrated in the insertion mechanism. Moreover, a test bench for insertion studies under constant and reproducible boundary conditions is proposed. It is used to experimentally validate the force sensing insertion tool, which is achieved by comparing the acquired forces to a ground truth measurement. The results of insertion studies on both an acrylic cochlear phantom and temporal bone specimen are given and discussed. RESULTS: Results reveal that friction, occurring between the electrode carrier and the inside of the insertion tool guide tube, is likely to affect the force output of the proposed sensor. An appropriate method to compensate for these disturbances is presented and experimentally validated. Using the proposed approach to friction identification, a mean accuracy of (4.0±3.2) mN is observed. CONCLUSIONS: The force information provided by the proposed, automated insertion tool can be used to detect complications during electrode insertion. However, in order to obtain accurate results, an identification of frictional forces prior to insertion is mandatory. The insertion tool is capable of automatically executing the appropriate trajectories.
PURPOSE: Minimally invasive cochlear implantation and residual hearing preservation require both the surgical approach to the cochlea as well as the implant insertion to be performed in an atraumatic fashion. Considering the geometric limitations of this approach, specialized instrumentation is required to insert the electrode while preserving intracochlear membranes carrying the sensory hair cells. METHODS: An automated insertion tool for cochlear implants, which is capable of sensing insertion forces with a theoretical resolution of 30 μN, is presented. In contrast to previous designs, the custom force sensor is integrated in the insertion mechanism. Moreover, a test bench for insertion studies under constant and reproducible boundary conditions is proposed. It is used to experimentally validate the force sensing insertion tool, which is achieved by comparing the acquired forces to a ground truth measurement. The results of insertion studies on both an acrylic cochlear phantom and temporal bone specimen are given and discussed. RESULTS: Results reveal that friction, occurring between the electrode carrier and the inside of the insertion tool guide tube, is likely to affect the force output of the proposed sensor. An appropriate method to compensate for these disturbances is presented and experimentally validated. Using the proposed approach to friction identification, a mean accuracy of (4.0±3.2) mN is observed. CONCLUSIONS: The force information provided by the proposed, automated insertion tool can be used to detect complications during electrode insertion. However, in order to obtain accurate results, an identification of frictional forces prior to insertion is mandatory. The insertion tool is capable of automatically executing the appropriate trajectories.
Authors: Ramya Balachandran; Jason E Mitchell; Grégoire Blachon; Jack H Noble; Benoit M Dawant; J Michael Fitzpatrick; Robert F Labadie Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Robert Frederick Labadie; Jack H Noble; Benoit M Dawant; Ramya Balachandran; Omid Majdani; J Michael Fitzpatrick Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Omid Majdani; Thomas S Rau; Stephan Baron; Hubertus Eilers; Claas Baier; Bodo Heimann; Tobias Ortmaier; Sönke Bartling; Thomas Lenarz; Martin Leinung Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2009-06-13 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Robert F Labadie; Ramya Balachandran; Jason E Mitchell; Jack H Noble; Omid Majdani; David S Haynes; Marc L Bennett; Benoit M Dawant; J Michael Fitzpatrick Journal: Otol Neurotol Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 2.311
Authors: Omid Majdani; Daniel Schurzig; Andreas Hussong; Thomas Rau; Justin Wittkopf; Thomas Lenarz; Robert F Labadie Journal: Acta Otolaryngol Date: 2010 Impact factor: 1.494
Authors: Jan-Philipp Kobler; Sergej Wall; G Jakob Lexow; Carl Philipp Lang; Omid Majdani; Lüder A Kahrs; Tobias Ortmaier Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2015-02-12 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Jan-Philipp Kobler; Michael Schoppe; G Jakob Lexow; Thomas S Rau; Omid Majdani; Lüder A Kahrs; Tobias Ortmaier Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2014-04-12 Impact factor: 2.924