Literature DB >> 1609072

Radiology-assisted placement of implantable subcutaneous infusion ports for long-term venous access.

S L Morris1, P F Jaques, M A Mauro.   

Abstract

Implantable infusion port devices are generally placed surgically. A technique for radiology-guided placement in adults is described, and the experience with 103 attempted port placements between June 1989 and October 1991 is analyzed. Placements were successful in 102 attempts (99%). Minor procedural difficulties occurred in six patients (5.9%). One major procedural complication (large hematoma) precluded port placement. Two patients were lost to follow-up after uncomplicated placements. There were four (4.0% of 100 patients) minor late complications. Major late complications requiring port removal occurred in 13 (13.0%): five suspected catheter-related infections, four catheter-related venous thromboses refractory to thrombolysis, and one each of wound dehiscence, formation of hematoma near the port, extraluminal migration of the catheter, and poor blood return. With a cumulative follow-up of 15,880 days (43.5 patient-years) available, a rate of major complications of 13.6%, or 0.86% per 1,000 access days, is comparable to the rates of large surgical series. Radiology-guided placement of infusion ports is safe and may offer advantages over surgical implantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1609072     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.184.1.1609072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  13 in total

1.  Subcutaneous ports in the radiology suite: an effective and safe procedure for care in cancer patients.

Authors:  M A de Gregorio; J M Miguelena; J A Fernández; C de Gregorio; A Tres; E R Alfonso
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Iatrogenic percutaneous vascular injuries: clinical presentation, imaging, and management.

Authors:  Benjamin H Ge; Alexander Copelan; Dominic Scola; Micah M Watts
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.513

3.  Placement of port-a-cath through the right internal jugular vein under ultrasound guidance.

Authors:  E Capalbo; M Peli; M Lovisatti; M Cosentino; V Ticha; M Cariati; G Cornalba
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Totally Implantable Central Venous Port Catheters: Radiation Exposure as a Function of Puncture Site and Operator Experience.

Authors:  Martin Jonczyk; Bernhard Gebauer; Roman Rotzinger; Dirk Schnapauff; Bernd Hamm; Federico Collettini
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.155

5.  Subcutaneous infusion ports via the internal jugular vein: single center experience.

Authors:  Bulent Karaman; Cagatay Andic; Nisa Cem Oren; Bilal Battal; Bahri Ustunsoz
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2010-08

6.  Performance of venous port catheter insertion by a general surgeon: a prospective study.

Authors:  Mehmet Aziret; Oktay İrkörücü; Cihan Gökler; Enver Reyhan; Süleyman Çetinkünar; Timuçin Çil; Edip Akpınar; Hasan Erdem; Kamuran Cumhur Değer
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2015-05

7.  It appears to be safe to start chemotherapy on the day of implantation through subcutaneous venous port catheters in inpatient setting.

Authors:  Nuriye Yildirim Ozdemir; Hüseyin Abali; Berna Oksüzoğlu; Burçin Budakoğlu; Ilkay Akmangit; Nurullah Zengin
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Long-term outcomes of peripheral arm ports implanted in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Junichiro Kawamura; Satoshi Nagayama; Akinari Nomura; Atsushi Itami; Hiroshi Okabe; Seiji Sato; Go Watanabe; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Implantation of central venous ports with catheter insertion via the right internal jugular vein in oncology patients: single center experience.

Authors:  J Charvát; Z Linke; M Horáèková; J Prausová
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 3.359

Review 10.  Long-term outcome of radiological-guided insertion of implanted central venous access port devices (CVAPD) for the delivery of chemotherapy in cancer patients: institutional experience and review of the literature.

Authors:  J Vardy; K Engelhardt; K Cox; J Jacquet; A McDade; M Boyer; P Beale; M Stockler; R Loneragan; B Dennien; R Waugh; S J Clarke
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-09-13       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.