Literature DB >> 8934144

Subcutaneous ports in the radiology suite: an effective and safe procedure for care in cancer patients.

M A de Gregorio1, J M Miguelena, J A Fernández, C de Gregorio, A Tres, E R Alfonso.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to present our experience and compare the results of the three types of ports used as a central venous access and performed in the radiology suite. Between March 1989 and November 1993 we performed 288 implantations (100 Implantofix Seldinger, 100 plastic Hickman port, and 88 stainless steel Port-a-cath) for chemotherapeutic treatment on the same number of patients diagnosed as having cancer. In all cases access was obtained via a subclavian vein (the left one in 185 cases and the right one in 103). All the system ports were implanted in the radiology suite. In all cases the procedure was successfully performed. Complications occurred in 26.3% of cases, most notably thrombosis in 13 cases (4.5%) and infection in 12 cases (4.1%). Duration of the port systems placement varied between 17 and 1467 days (a mean of 315 days). A total of 133 systems have been removed to date, 80 (60.%) due to termination of chemotherapy, and 53(40%) for treatment of complications. Significant differences (complications and port duration time) were not observed between the three types of reservoir used. Subcutaneous ports are safe, comfortable, and effective devices for central venous access.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8934144     DOI: 10.1007/bf00187683

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  22 in total

1.  Radiologic placement of Hickman catheters.

Authors:  L J Robertson; M A Mauro; P F Jaques
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  A silicone rubber atrial catheter for prolonged parenteral alimentation.

Authors:  J W Broviac; J J Cole; B H Scribner
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1973-04

3.  Local infusion of urokinase for the lysis of thrombosis associated with permanent central venous catheters in cancer patients.

Authors:  G Fraschini; J Jadeja; M Lawson; F A Holmes; H C Carrasco; S Wallace
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Vascular access for chemotherapy: general methodology and experience with a new reservoir.

Authors:  R E Kusminsky; J P Boland
Journal:  W V Med J       Date:  1979-08

Review 5.  Placement and management of long-term central venous access catheters and ports.

Authors:  D F Denny
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Insertion of Hickman catheters. A comparison of cutdown and percutaneous techniques.

Authors:  S J Davis; J S Thompson; J A Edney
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 0.688

7.  Hickman catheter-induced thoracic vein thrombosis. Frequency and long-term sequelae in patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy and marrow transplantation.

Authors:  W D Haire; R P Lieberman; J Edney; W P Vaughan; A Kessinger; J O Armitage; J C Goldsmith
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1990-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Radiology-assisted placement of implantable subcutaneous infusion ports for long-term venous access.

Authors:  S L Morris; P F Jaques; M A Mauro
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Subclavian vein thrombosis in patients treated with infusion chemotherapy for advanced malignancy.

Authors:  J J Lokich; B Becker
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1983-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Experience with subcutaneous infusion ports in three hundred patients.

Authors:  T E Brothers; L K Von Moll; J E Niederhuber; J A Roberts; S Walker-Andrews; W D Ensminger
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1988-04
View more
  9 in total

1.  Retrospective outcome analysis of rates and types of complications after 8654 minimally invasive radiological port implantations via the subclavian vein without ultrasound guidance.

Authors:  Karolin J Paprottka; Jana Voelklein; Tobias Waggershauser; Maximilian F Reiser; Philipp M Paprottka
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  [How should urologists perform implantation of subcutaneous central venous port systems? A single center experience of 347 cases].

Authors:  M Schenck; W Michels-Oswald; S Tschirdewahn; H Rübben; F Vom Dorp; A Rose; A Panic; C Niedworok; R Rossi
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  Systematic review: malfunction of totally implantable venous access devices in cancer patients.

Authors:  Godelieve Alice Goossens; Marguerite Stas; Martine Jérôme; Philip Moons
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Central venous port implantations via the cephalic vein applying an intravasal electrographic control of the catheter tip position: a single-center experience of 316 cases.

Authors:  Marcus Schenck; Tim Schneider; Herbert Rübben; Andreas Eisenhardt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-08-28       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Administration of chemotherapy via the median cubital vein without implantable central venous access ports: port-free chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Yoichiro Yoshida; Seiichiro Hoshino; Naoya Aisu; Masayasu Naito; Syu Tanimura; Ai Mogi; Toshihiro Tanaka; Keiji Hirata; Kazuo Tamura; Yuichi Yamashita
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Implantation of central venous ports with catheter insertion via the right internal jugular vein in oncology patients: single center experience.

Authors:  J Charvát; Z Linke; M Horáèková; J Prausová
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 3.359

Review 7.  Long-term outcome of radiological-guided insertion of implanted central venous access port devices (CVAPD) for the delivery of chemotherapy in cancer patients: institutional experience and review of the literature.

Authors:  J Vardy; K Engelhardt; K Cox; J Jacquet; A McDade; M Boyer; P Beale; M Stockler; R Loneragan; B Dennien; R Waugh; S J Clarke
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-09-13       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Central venous port system associated thromboses: outcome in 3498 implantations and literature review.

Authors:  Martina Schumacher; Roland H Wagner
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2007-09-03

9.  Comparison of intraoperative ultrasonography guidance with an open surgical method for venous port catheter placement in chemotherapy.

Authors:  Ozan Onur Balkanay; Suleyman Demiryas
Journal:  North Clin Istanb       Date:  2018-11-28
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.