Literature DB >> 1609069

Average radiation dose in standard CT examinations of the head: results of the 1990 NEXT survey.

B J Conway1, J L McCrohan, R G Antonsen, F G Rueter, R J Slayton, O H Suleiman.   

Abstract

In 1990, as part of the Nationwide Evaluation of X-ray Trends (NEXT) program, 252 computed tomographic (CT) systems were evaluated to measure radiation doses associated with standard head CT in adults. The multiple-scan average dose (MSAD) was used as the dose descriptor. For most of the systems, the MSAD at the midpoint on the central axis of a standard dosimetry phantom was between 34 and 55 mGy. Doses were as high as 140 mGy, and dose sometimes varied by a factor of two or more for identical CT units. This range indicates that dose can potentially be reduced by careful selection of standard CT techniques. Users of CT systems should be aware of radiation dose delivered with CT, dose ranges associated with different systems, and doses delivered with their particular unit, which requires that dose performance of CT systems be assessed by means of a protocol that allows comparison of data collected for identical and/or different units.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1609069     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.184.1.1609069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  6 in total

1.  CT of the head by use of reduced current and kilovoltage: relationship between image quality and dose reduction.

Authors:  M Cohnen; H Fischer; J Hamacher; E Lins; R Kötter; U Mödder
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Radiation exposure of patients in comprehensive computed tomography of the head in acute stroke.

Authors:  M Cohnen; H-J Wittsack; S Assadi; K Muskalla; A Ringelstein; L W Poll; A Saleh; U Mödder
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Fears, feelings, and facts: interactively communicating benefits and risks of medical radiation with patients.

Authors:  Lawrence T Dauer; Raymond H Thornton; Jennifer L Hay; Rochelle Balter; Matthew J Williamson; Jean St Germain
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  CT versus plain radiographs for evaluation of c-spine injury in young children: do benefits outweigh risks?

Authors:  Ricardo R Jimenez; Michael A Deguzman; Shelly Shiran; Andrew Karrellas; Robert L Lorenzo
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2008-03-27

5.  Patient dose in dual x-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  M K Lewis; G M Blake; I Fogelman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Thyroid Radiation Dose to Patients from Diagnostic Radiology Procedures over Eight Decades: 1930-2010.

Authors:  Lienard A Chang; Donald L Miller; Choonsik Lee; Dunstana R Melo; Daphnée Villoing; Vladimir Drozdovitch; Isabelle Thierry-Chef; Sarah J Winters; Michael Labrake; Charles F Myers; Hyeyeun Lim; Cari M Kitahara; Martha S Linet; Steven L Simon
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.316

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.