Literature DB >> 16085617

Comparison of polyethylene wear associated with cobalt-chromium and zirconia heads after total hip replacement. A prospective, randomized study.

Young-Hoo Kim1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A ceramic femoral head is an alternative to a metal femoral head for the bearing surface of total hip arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to compare polyethylene wear in patients who had undergone bilateral total hip arthroplasty with implants that differed only with regard to the material used for the femoral head: a zirconia head was used on one side, and a cobalt-chromium head was inserted on the contralateral side.
METHODS: A prospective, randomized study was performed to evaluate the outcomes in fifty-two patients who had undergone sequential bilateral primary total hip replacement. A zirconia head was used in one hip, and a cobalt-chromium head was used in the other. There were forty-eight men and four women; the mean age at the time of surgery was 44.2 years. The mean duration of follow-up was 7.1 years. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed preoperatively and at six weeks; three, six, and twelve months; and yearly postoperatively. Linear wear of the polyethylene liner was measured radiographically. Two femoral components with a zirconia head had aseptic loosening and were revised. The explanted heads were evaluated with use of interferometry, environmental scanning electron microscopy, and x-ray diffraction studies.
RESULTS: The mean polyethylene wear rate was 0.08 mm/yr in association with the zirconia heads and 0.17 mm/yr in association with the cobalt-chromium heads (p = 0.004). The mean amount of volumetric polyethylene wear was 350.8 mm3 in association with the zirconia heads and 744.7 mm3 in association with the cobalt-chromium heads (p = 0.004). With regard to surface roughness, the Ra values of the two explanted zirconia heads were 15.87 and 17.35 nm and the Rpm values were 153.86 and 156.18 nm. Two identical zirconia heads that had not been implanted had Ra values of 5.31 and 5.48 nm and Rpm values of 65.27 and 66.35 nm. Four unimplanted cobalt-chromium heads that were identical to the ones implanted in this study had Ra values ranging between 25 and 50 nm and Rpm values ranging between 262.6 and 525.2 nm. Little phase transformation was noted in the two revised zirconia heads.
CONCLUSIONS: The mean amount and rate of polyethylene wear were significantly lower in the hips with a zirconia head than they were in the hips with a cobalt-chromium head, presumably because the zirconia heads had a smoother articulating surface.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16085617     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02572

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  14 in total

Review 1.  Manufacturers affect clinical results of THA with zirconia heads: a systematic review.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Yoshitomi; Satoru Shikata; Hiromu Ito; Takeo Nakayama; Takashi Nakamura
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-01-31       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Reduced wear of cross-linked UHMWPE using magnesia-stabilized zirconia femoral heads in a hip simulator.

Authors:  Marcel E Roy; Leo A Whiteside; Mark E Magill; Brian J Katerberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Early reactive synovitis and osteolysis after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  H John Cooper; Amar S Ranawat; Hollis G Potter; Li Foong Foo; Trevor W Koob; Chitranjan S Ranawat
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Similar wear in total hip arthroplasties with metallic or zirconia femoral heads.

Authors:  Randy M Cohn; Alejandro González Della Valle; Margaret Peterson; Charles N Cornell
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2008-07-15

5.  Clinical comparison of polyethylene wear with zirconia or cobalt-chromium femoral heads.

Authors:  Maiken Stilling; Kjeld Anton Nielsen; Kjeld Søballe; Ole Rahbek
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Is there any difference in survivorship of total hip arthroplasty with different bearing surfaces? A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Si Yin; Dangfeng Zhang; Hui Du; Heng Du; Zhanhai Yin; Yusheng Qiu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-11-15

7.  Advanced wear of an Oxinium™ femoral head implant following polyethylene liner dislocation.

Authors:  H Tribe; S Malek; J Stammers; V Ranawat; J A Skinner
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Retrieval analysis of new-generation yttria-stabilized zirconia femoral heads after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kiyokazu Fukui; Ayumi Kaneuji; Tanzo Sugimori; Toru Ichiseki; Tadami Matsumoto
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-12-31

9.  No Difference in Conventional Polyethylene Wear Between Yttria-stabilized Zirconia and Cobalt-chromium-molybdenum Femoral Heads at 10 Years.

Authors:  Todd A Morrison; Rebecca D Moore; Jia Meng; Clare M Rimnac; Matthew J Kraay
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2017-10-13

10.  In vivo wear performance of highly cross-linked polyethylene vs. yttria stabilized zirconia and alumina stabilized zirconia at a mean seven-year follow-up.

Authors:  Masahiro Hasegawa; Akihiro Sudo
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.