Literature DB >> 11204406

Orientation of the opposition axis in mentally simulated grasping.

V Frak1, Y Paulignan, M Jeannerod.   

Abstract

Five normal subjects were tested in a simulated grasping task. A cylindrical container filled with water was placed on the center of a horizontal monitor screen. Subjects used a precision grip formed by the thumb and index finger of their right hand. After a preliminary run during which the container was present, it was replaced by an image of the upper surface of the cylinder appearing on the horizontal computer screen on which the real cylinder was placed during the preliminary run. In each trial the image was marked with two contact points which defined an opposition axis in various orientations with respect to the frontal plane. The subjects' task consisted, once shown a stimulus, of judging as quickly as possible whether the previously experienced action of grasping the container full of water and pouring the water out would be easy, difficult or impossible with the fingers placed according to the opposition axis indicated on the circle. Response times were found to be longer for the grasps judged to be more difficult due to the orientation and position of the opposition axis. In a control experiment, three subjects actually performed the grasps with different orientations and positions of the opposition axis. The effects of these parameters on response time followed the same trends as during simulated movements. This result shows that simulated hand movements take into account the same biomechanical limitations as actually performed movements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11204406     DOI: 10.1007/s002210000583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  30 in total

1.  Selection of wrist posture in conditions of motor ambiguity.

Authors:  Daniel K Wood; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Aging and inhibitory errors on a motor shift of set task.

Authors:  Lauren M Potter; Madeleine A Grealy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Effects of an orientation illusion on motor performance and motor imagery.

Authors:  Scott Glover; Peter Dixon; Umberto Castiello; Matthew F S Rushworth
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Aiming for the future: prospective action difficulty, prescribed difficulty, and Fitts' law.

Authors:  Andrew B Slifkin; Suzanne M Grilli
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-06-13       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The effect of orientation on prehension movement time.

Authors:  Elsje van Bergen; Lisa M van Swieten; Justin H G Williams; Mark Mon-Williams
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Motor planning, imagery, and execution in the distributed motor network: a time-course study with functional MRI.

Authors:  Takashi Hanakawa; Michael A Dimyan; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Action-specific influences on distance perception: a role for motor simulation.

Authors:  Jessica K Witt; Dennis R Proffitt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Imagined actions in multiple sclerosis patients: evidence of decline in motor cognitive prediction.

Authors:  Andrea Tacchino; Marco Bove; Ludovico Pedullà; Mario Alberto Battaglia; Charalambos Papaxanthis; Giampaolo Brichetto
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Visuo-motor learning with combination of different rates of motor imagery and physical practice.

Authors:  Nadia Allami; Yves Paulignan; Andrea Brovelli; Driss Boussaoud
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Misperceiving the speed-accuracy tradeoff: imagined movements and perceptual decisions.

Authors:  Scott J Young; Jay Pratt; Tom Chau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.