Literature DB >> 16082496

Femoral neck geometry and hip fracture risk: the Geelong osteoporosis study.

S El-Kaissi1, J A Pasco, M J Henry, S Panahi, J G Nicholson, G C Nicholson, M A Kotowicz.   

Abstract

To determine the relationship between femoral neck geometry and the risk of hip fracture in post-menopausal Caucasian women, we conducted a retrospective study comparing the femoral neck dimensions of 62 hip fracture cases to those of 608 randomly selected controls. Measurements were made from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans (Lunar DPX-L), using the manufacturer's ruler function, and included: hip axis length (HAL), femoral neck axis length (FNAL), femoral neck width (FNW), femoral shaft width (FSW), medial femoral shaft cortical thickness (FSCT(med)), and lateral femoral shaft cortical thickness (FSCT(lat)). The fracture group was older (median age 78.3 years vs 73.8 years), lighter (median weight 59.9 kg vs 64.5 kg), and, after adjustment for age, taller (mean height 158.7+/-0.8 cm vs 156.7+/-0.2 cm) than the controls. Furthermore, bone mineral density was lower in this group (0.682+/-0.016 g/cm(2) vs 0.791+/-0.006 g/cm(2)). After adjustment for age, bone mineral content (BMC) or height, hip fracture patients had greater FNW (up to 6.6%) and FSW (up to 6.3%) than did the controls. Each standard deviation increase in FNW and FSW was associated with a 1.7-fold (95% CI 1.3-2.3) and a 2.4-fold (95% CI 1.8-3.2) increase in the fracture risk, respectively. BMC-adjusted FNAL was greater in the fracture group (+2.1%) than in the controls, while the age-adjusted FSCT(med) was reduced (-7.2%). There was a trend towards longer HAL (up to 2.1%) after adjustment for age or BMC, and thinner age-adjusted FSCT(lat) (-1.7%) in fracture patients that did not reach statistical significance. In multivariate analysis, the risk of hip fracture was predicted by the combination of age, FNW, FSW, BMC and FSCT(med). HAL was not analyzed because of the small number of HAL measurements among fracture cases. We conclude that post-menopausal women with hip fractures have wider femoral necks and shafts, thinner femoral cortices and longer femoral neck axis lengths than do women with no fractures. Alteration in hip geometry is associated with the risk of hip fracture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16082496     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-005-1988-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  20 in total

1.  Femoral neck dimensions are unlikely to be associated with age at menarche.

Authors:  J A Pasco; S Panahi; M J Henry; E Seeman; G C Nicholson; M A Kotowicz
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Geometry of proximal femur in the prediction of hip fracture in osteoporotic women.

Authors:  S Gnudi; C Ripamonti; G Gualtieri; N Malavolta
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Femoral bone mineral density, neck-shaft angle and mean femoral neck width as predictors of hip fracture in men and women. Multicenter Project for Research in Osteoporosis.

Authors:  C G Alonso; M D Curiel; F H Carranza; R P Cano; A D Peréz
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Age- and gender-specific rate of fractures in Australia: a population-based study.

Authors:  K M Sanders; E Seeman; A M Ugoni; J A Pasco; T J Martin; B Skoric; G C Nicholson; M A Kotowicz
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Ambulatory level and asymmetrical weight bearing after stroke affects bone loss in the upper and lower part of the femoral neck differently: bone adaptation after decreased mechanical loading.

Authors:  L Jørgensen; N J Crabtree; J Reeve; B K Jacobsen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Health burden of hip and other fractures in Australia beyond 2000. Projections based on the Geelong Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  K M Sanders; G C Nicholson; A M Ugoni; J A Pasco; E Seeman; M A Kotowicz
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1999-05-17       Impact factor: 7.738

7.  Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W Browner; J Cauley; K Ensrud; H K Genant; L Palermo; J Scott; T M Vogt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Prediction of hip fractures from pelvic radiographs: the study of osteoporotic fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  C C Glüer; S R Cummings; A Pressman; J Li; K Glüer; K G Faulkner; S Grampp; H K Genant
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Measurement of femoral geometry in type I and type II osteoporosis: differences in hip axis length consistent with heterogeneity in the pathogenesis of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  S Boonen; R Koutri; J Dequeker; J Aerssens; G Lowet; J Nijs; G Verbeke; E Lesaffre; P Geusens
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Prevalence of osteoporosis in Australian women: Geelong Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  M J Henry; J A Pasco; G C Nicholson; E Seeman; M A Kotowicz
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.963

View more
  32 in total

Review 1.  Bone geometry and skeletal fragility.

Authors:  Mary L Bouxsein; David Karasik
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.096

2.  Differences in femoral neck geometry associated with age and ethnicity.

Authors:  K M Kim; J K Brown; K J Kim; H S Choi; H N Kim; Y Rhee; S-K Lim
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Expected frequency of biomechanically adverse values of proximal femur geometric variables for fracture risk in the East Slovak female population (epidemiological study).

Authors:  Jaroslava Wendlová
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2011-07-29

4.  Development of a parametric finite element model of the proximal femur using statistical shape and density modelling.

Authors:  Daniel P Nicolella; Todd L Bredbenner
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 1.763

5.  Morphometry of Proximal Femur in Indian Population.

Authors:  Minakshi Verma; Sheetal Joshi; Anita Tuli; Shashi Raheja; Priyanka Jain; Priyanka Srivastava
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-02-01

6.  Imaging-Based Methods for Non-invasive Assessment of Bone Properties Influenced by Mechanical Loading.

Authors:  Norma J Macintyre; Amanda L Lorbergs
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 1.037

7.  The natural history and hip geometric changes of primary hyperparathyroidism without parathyroid surgery.

Authors:  Kyong Yeun Jung; A Ram Hong; Dong Hwa Lee; Jung Hee Kim; Kyoung Min Kim; Chan Soo Shin; Seong Yeon Kim; Sang Wan Kim
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 8.  Bone quality: the determinants of bone strength and fragility.

Authors:  Hélder Fonseca; Daniel Moreira-Gonçalves; Hans-Joachim Appell Coriolano; José Alberto Duarte
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Effect of parity on phalangeal bone mineral density in post-menopausal Sri Lankan women: a community based cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Sarath Lekamwasam; Lalith Wijayaratne; Mahinda Rodrigo; Udul Hewage
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.092

10.  Vitamin K2 supplementation improves hip bone geometry and bone strength indices in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  M H J Knapen; L J Schurgers; C Vermeer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.