Literature DB >> 19292752

Effect of parity on phalangeal bone mineral density in post-menopausal Sri Lankan women: a community based cross-sectional study.

Sarath Lekamwasam1, Lalith Wijayaratne, Mahinda Rodrigo, Udul Hewage.   

Abstract

There is paucity of studies related to parity and bone mineral density in South Asian countries. We recruited 713 healthy, community dwelling post-menopausal women from seven provinces in Sri Lanka for this survey. The number of pregnancies, including miscarriages beyond 20 weeks of gestation, was recorded. Women with diseases and those who have taken drugs that can affect bone mineral density (BMD) were excluded (n = 15). Phalangeal BMD and bone mineral content (BMC) were measured using AccuDEXA in 713 women. Mean (SE) BMD of nulliparous women (n = 32), women with one to two pregnancies (n = 284), three to four pregnancies (n = 290) and more than four pregnancies (n = 107) were 0.437(0.014), 0.454(0.005), 0.455(0.005) and 0.417(0.006) g/cm(2), respectively (P < 0.001). Corresponding mean (SE) BMCs were 1.30(0.063), 1.41(0.021), 1.43(0.022) and 1.32(0.033) g, respectively (P < 0.001). Women with more than four pregnancies were older and lighter when compared with other groups. When results were adjusted for current age and current weight, differences in mean BMD and BMC between groups became non-significant. BMD of nulliparous women remained low in all analyses. We report a significant difference in unadjusted phalangeal BMD in women categorized according to their parity. Women with one to four pregnancies had the highest phalangeal BMD and BMC, while multi-parous (more than four pregnancies) and nulliparous women had lower values. However, in an adjusted analysis, the differences in BMD and BMC were partially explained by the differences of age and body weight between the groups and the unique effect of parity was difficult to determine. Women with lower BMD may have a higher risk of future fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19292752      PMCID: PMC6860849          DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-8709.2008.00171.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Nutr        ISSN: 1740-8695            Impact factor:   3.092


  30 in total

1.  Risk factors for perimenopausal distal forearm fracture.

Authors:  R J Honkanen; K Honkanen; H Kröger; E Alhava; M Tuppurainen; S Saarikoski
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Longitudinal changes in bone mineral density during normal pregnancy.

Authors:  M Kaur; D Pearson; I Godber; N Lawson; P Baker; D Hosking
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  High parity is associated with increased bone size and strength.

Authors:  Bonny Specker; Teresa Binkley
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Bone density determinants in elderly women: a twin study.

Authors:  L Flicker; J L Hopper; L Rodgers; B Kaymakci; R M Green; J D Wark
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Reproduction life history and hip fractures.

Authors:  Hans Chr Petersen; Bernard Jeune; James W Vaupel; Kaare Christensen
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.797

6.  Body size and hip fracture risk in older women: a prospective study. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  K E Ensrud; R C Lipschutz; J A Cauley; D Seeley; M C Nevitt; J Scott; E S Orwoll; H K Genant; S R Cummings
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 7.  Bone status during adolescence, pregnancy and lactation.

Authors:  Kate A Ward; Judith E Adams; M Zulf Mughal
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.927

8.  Body mass index and gynecological factors as determinants of bone mass in healthy Moroccan women.

Authors:  Abdellah El Maghraoui; Ahmed Anas Guerboub; Aziza Mounach; Imad Ghozlani; Abderrazak Nouijai; Mirieme Ghazi; Lahsen Achemlal; Ahmed Bezza; Mohamed Adnane Tazi
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Predictive value of BMD for hip and other fractures.

Authors:  Olof Johnell; John A Kanis; Anders Oden; Helena Johansson; Chris De Laet; Pierre Delmas; John A Eisman; Seiko Fujiwara; Heikki Kroger; Dan Mellstrom; Pierre J Meunier; L Joseph Melton; Terry O'Neill; Huibert Pols; Jonathan Reeve; Alan Silman; Alan Tenenhouse
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2005-03-07       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Effect of parity on bone mineral density among postmenopausal Saudi Arabian women.

Authors:  Mir Sadat-Ali; Ibrahim Al-Habdan; Abdul-Aziz Al-Mulhim; Abdallah Y El-Hassan
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.484

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.