Literature DB >> 16075843

A signal detection analysis of contingency data.

Lorraine G Allan1, Shepard Siegel, Jason M Tangen.   

Abstract

There are many psychological tasks that involve the pairing of binary variables. The various tasks used often address different questions and are motivated by different theoretical issues and traditions. Upon closer examination, however, the tasks are remarkably similar in structure. In the present paper, we examine two such tasks, the contingency judgment task and the signal detection task, and we apply a signal detection analysis to contingency judgment data. We suggest that the signal detection analysis provides a novel interpretation of a well-established but poorly understood phenomenon of contingency judgments--the outcome-density effect.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16075843     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  17 in total

1.  The 28th Bartlett Memorial Lecture. Causal learning: an associative analysis.

Authors:  A Dickinson
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  2001-02

2.  The relative effect of cue interaction.

Authors:  Jason M Tangen; Lorraine G Allan
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  2003-08

3.  Cue interaction and judgments of causality: contributions of causal and associative processes.

Authors:  Jason M Tangen; Lorraine G Allan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-01

4.  Temporal contiguity and contingency judgments: a Pavlovian analogue.

Authors:  Lorraine G Allan; Jason M Tangen; Robert Wood; Taral Shah
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  2003 Jul-Sep

Review 5.  Judging relationships between events: how do we do it?

Authors:  Lorraine G Allan; Jason M Tangen
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2005-03

6.  The effects of payoffs and prior probabilities on indices of performance and cutoff location in recognition memory.

Authors:  A F Healy; M Kubovy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1978-09

Review 7.  Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems.

Authors:  J A Swets
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-06-03       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Human instrumental learning: a critical review of data and theory.

Authors:  D R Shanks
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1993-08

Review 9.  Human contingency judgments: rule based or associative?

Authors:  L G Allan
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 17.737

10.  A signal detection theory analysis of the placebo effect.

Authors:  Lorraine G Allan; Shepard Siegel
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.651

View more
  22 in total

1.  Contrasting cue-density effects in causal and prediction judgments.

Authors:  Miguel A Vadillo; Serban C Musca; Fernando Blanco; Helena Matute
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-02

2.  The effects of problem content and scientific background on information search and the assessment and valuation of correlations.

Authors:  Shira Soffer; Yaakov Kareev
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-01

3.  Interactive effects of the probability of the cue and the probability of the outcome on the overestimation of null contingency.

Authors:  Fernando Blanco; Helena Matute; Miguel A Vadillo
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Causal discounting in the presence of a stronger cue is due to bias.

Authors:  Jeffrey P Laux; Kelly M Goedert; Arthur B Markman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-04

5.  The influence of the number of relevant causes on the processing of covariation information in causal reasoning.

Authors:  Kyungil Kim; Arthur B Markman; Tae Hoon Kim
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2016-06-17

6.  Time-scale-invariant information-theoretic contingencies in discrimination learning.

Authors:  Abigail Kalmbach; Eileen Chun; Kathleen Taylor; Charles R Gallistel; Peter D Balsam
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 2.478

7.  Causal and predictive-value judgments, but not predictions, are based on cue-outcome contingency.

Authors:  Miguel A Vadillo; Ralph R Miller; Helena Matute
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 8.  Illusions of causality: how they bias our everyday thinking and how they could be reduced.

Authors:  Helena Matute; Fernando Blanco; Ion Yarritu; Marcos Díaz-Lago; Miguel A Vadillo; Itxaso Barberia
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-02

9.  Dysphoric Mood States are Related to Sensitivity to Temporal Changes in Contingency.

Authors:  Rachel M Msetfi; Robin A Murphy; Diana E Kornbrot
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-09-27

10.  Pathological gamblers are more vulnerable to the illusion of control in a standard associative learning task.

Authors:  Cristina Orgaz; Ana Estévez; Helena Matute
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-06-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.