Literature DB >> 23529636

Interactive effects of the probability of the cue and the probability of the outcome on the overestimation of null contingency.

Fernando Blanco1, Helena Matute, Miguel A Vadillo.   

Abstract

Overestimations of null contingencies between a cue, C, and an outcome, O, are widely reported effects that can arise for multiple reasons. For instance, a high probability of the cue, P(C), and a high probability of the outcome, P(O), are conditions that promote such overestimations. In two experiments, participants were asked to judge the contingency between a cue and an outcome. Both P(C) and P(O) were given extreme values (high and low) in a factorial design, while maintaining the contingency between the two events at zero. While we were able to observe main effects of the probability of each event, our experiments showed that the cue- and outcome-density biases interacted such that a high probability of the two stimuli enhanced the overestimation beyond the effects observed when only one of the two events was frequent. This evidence can be used to better understand certain societal issues, such as belief in pseudoscience, that can be the result of overestimations of null contingencies in high-P(C) or high-P(O) situations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23529636     DOI: 10.3758/s13420-013-0108-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  22 in total

1.  Causal judgment from contingency information: a systematic test of the pCI rule.

Authors:  Peter A White
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-04

2.  Making the illusory correlation effect appear and then disappear: the effects of increased learning.

Authors:  Robin A Murphy; Stefanie Schmeer; Frédéric Vallée-Tourangeau; Esther Mondragón; Denis Hilton
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 2.143

3.  Dissociation between judgments and outcome-expectancy measures in covariation learning: a signal detection theory approach.

Authors:  José C Perales; Andrés Catena; David R Shanks; José A González
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Contiguity and the outcome density bias in action-outcome contingency judgements.

Authors:  Frédéric Vallée-Tourangeau; Robin A Murphy; A G Baker
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  2005-04

5.  Illusions of causality at the heart of pseudoscience.

Authors:  Helena Matute; Ion Yarritu; Miguel A Vadillo
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2011-03-16

6.  Just tell me what to do: bringing back experimenter control in active contingency tasks with the command-performance procedure and finding cue density effects along the way.

Authors:  Samuel D Hannah; Jennifer L Beneteau
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2009-03

7.  Making the uncontrollable seem controllable: the role of action in the illusion of control.

Authors:  Fernando Blanco; Helena Matute; Miguel A Vadillo
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  Contributions of specific cell information to judgments of interevent contingency.

Authors:  E A Wasserman; W W Dorner; S F Kao
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: sadder but wiser?

Authors:  L B Alloy; L Y Abramson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1979-12

10.  Depressive realism and the effect of intertrial interval on judgements of zero, positive, and negative contingencies.

Authors:  Rachel M Msetfi; Robin A Murphy; Jane Simpson
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.143

View more
  23 in total

1.  Superstitious learning of abstract order from random reinforcement.

Authors:  Yuhao Jin; Greg Jensen; Jacqueline Gottlieb; Vincent Ferrera
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 12.779

2.  Reducing the illusion of control when an action is followed by an undesired outcome.

Authors:  Helena Matute; Fernando Blanco
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-08

3.  Previous knowledge can induce an illusion of causality through actively biasing behavior.

Authors:  Ion Yarritu; Helena Matute
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-08

Review 4.  Illusions of causality: how they bias our everyday thinking and how they could be reduced.

Authors:  Helena Matute; Fernando Blanco; Ion Yarritu; Marcos Díaz-Lago; Miguel A Vadillo; Itxaso Barberia
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-02

5.  Individuals Who Believe in the Paranormal Expose Themselves to Biased Information and Develop More Causal Illusions than Nonbelievers in the Laboratory.

Authors:  Fernando Blanco; Itxaso Barberia; Helena Matute
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Exploring the factors that encourage the illusions of control: the case of preventive illusions.

Authors:  Fernando Blanco; Helena Matute
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2015

7.  The lack of side effects of an ineffective treatment facilitates the development of a belief in its effectiveness.

Authors:  Fernando Blanco; Itxaso Barberia; Helena Matute
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Outcome probability modulates anticipatory behavior to signals that are equally reliable.

Authors:  Helena Matute; Sara Steegen; Miguel A Vadillo
Journal:  Adapt Behav       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.942

9.  Pathological gamblers are more vulnerable to the illusion of control in a standard associative learning task.

Authors:  Cristina Orgaz; Ana Estévez; Helena Matute
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-06-17

10.  Illusion of control: the role of personal involvement.

Authors:  Ion Yarritu; Helena Matute; Miguel A Vadillo
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2014-01-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.