Literature DB >> 16056131

Brain potentials to sexually suggestive whistles show meaning modulates the mismatch negativity.

Jason Frangos1, Walter Ritter, David Friedman.   

Abstract

Electroencephalographic data suggest that spoken words produce an enhanced output of the brain's automatic deviance detection system, as reflected by the mismatch negativity. Using meaningful and nonmeaningful whistles, we sought to distinguish the effect of semantic content on the brain's deviance detection system from language-specific stimulus features. In the meaningful condition, study participants heard a human 'wolf whistle', which is commonly interpreted as an unsolicited expression of sexual attention. In the nonmeaningful condition participants heard an acoustically identical, but digitally rearranged, version of the wolf whistle. The mismatch negativity amplitude was significantly larger when the infrequent stimulus was meaningful than when it was meaningless. These data suggest that enhanced mismatch negativity magnitude was due to the semantic valence of the eliciting deviant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16056131      PMCID: PMC1361366          DOI: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000175619.23807.b7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  20 in total

1.  Memory traces for words as revealed by the mismatch negativity.

Authors:  F Pulvermüller; T Kujala; Y Shtyrov; J Simola; H Tiitinen; P Alku; K Alho; S Martinkauppi; R J Ilmoniemi; R Näätänen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Automatic processing of grammar in the human brain as revealed by the mismatch negativity.

Authors:  Friedemann Pulvermüller; Yury Shtyrov
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Familiarity affects the processing of task-irrelevant auditory deviance.

Authors:  Thomas Jacobsen; Erich Schröger; István Winkler; János Horváth
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Letter: The epsilon-adjustment procedure for repeated-measures analyses of variance.

Authors:  J R Jennings; C C Wood
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Event-related brain potentials and the perception of a phonetic continuum.

Authors:  O Aaltonen; P Niemi; T Nyrke; M Tuhkanen
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 3.251

6.  A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP.

Authors:  H V Semlitsch; P Anderer; P Schuster; O Presslich
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted.

Authors:  R Näätänen; A W Gaillard; S Mäntysalo
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1978-07

8.  Event-related potentials (ERPs) to interruptions of a steady rhythm.

Authors:  J M Ford; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  Word-specific cortical activity as revealed by the mismatch negativity.

Authors:  Friedemann Pulvermüller; Yury Shtyrov; Teija Kujala; Risto Näätänen
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Responses of the primary auditory cortex to pitch changes in a sequence of tone pips: neuromagnetic recordings in man.

Authors:  R Hari; M Hämäläinen; R Ilmoniemi; E Kaukoranta; K Reinikainen; J Salminen; K Alho; R Näätänen; M Sams
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1984-09-07       Impact factor: 3.046

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  The cognitive determinants of behavioral distraction by deviant auditory stimuli: a review.

Authors:  Fabrice B R Parmentier
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-12-21

2.  Is my voice just a familiar voice? An electrophysiological study.

Authors:  Jérôme Graux; Marie Gomot; Sylvie Roux; Frédérique Bonnet-Brilhault; Nicole Bruneau
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Food words distract the hungry: Evidence of involuntary semantic processing of task-irrelevant but biologically-relevant unexpected auditory words.

Authors:  Fabrice B R Parmentier; Antonia P Pacheco-Unguetti; Sara Valero
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Distraction by deviant sounds during reading: An eye-movement study.

Authors:  Martin R Vasilev; Fabrice Br Parmentier; Bernhard Angele; Julie A Kirkby
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2019-01-13       Impact factor: 2.143

5.  Spatiotemporal signatures of large-scale synfire chains for speech processing as revealed by MEG.

Authors:  Friedemann Pulvermüller; Yury Shtyrov
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-05-05       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Discrimination of personally significant from nonsignificant sounds: a training study.

Authors:  Anja Roye; Thomas Jacobsen; Erich Schröger
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.526

7.  Effects of attention on what is known and what is not: MEG evidence for functionally discrete memory circuits.

Authors:  Max Garagnani; Yury Shtyrov; Friedemann Pulvermüller
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Somatotopic Semantic Priming and Prediction in the Motor System.

Authors:  Luigi Grisoni; Felix R Dreyer; Friedemann Pulvermüller
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Email Overload? Brain and Behavioral Responses to Common Messaging Alerts Are Heightened for Email Alerts and Are Associated With Job Involvement.

Authors:  Maria Uther; Michelle Cleveland; Rhiannon Jones
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-07-31

10.  Distraction by deviant sounds: disgusting and neutral words capture attention to the same extent.

Authors:  Fabrice B R Parmentier; Isabel Fraga; Alicia Leiva; Pilar Ferré
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-05-03
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.