Literature DB >> 16269107

Familiarity affects the processing of task-irrelevant auditory deviance.

Thomas Jacobsen1, Erich Schröger, István Winkler, János Horváth.   

Abstract

The effects of familiarity on auditory change detection on the basis of auditory sensory memory representations were investigated by presenting oddball sequences of sounds while participants ignored the auditory stimuli. Stimulus sequences were composed of sounds that were familiar and sounds that were made unfamiliar by playing the same sounds backward. The roles of frequently presented stimuli (standards) and infrequently presented ones (deviants) were fully crossed. Deviants elicited the mismatch negativity component of the event-related brain potential. We found an enhancement in detecting changes when deviant sounds appeared among familiar standard sounds compared when they were delivered among unfamiliar standards. Familiarity with the deviant sounds also enhanced the change-detection process. We suggest that tuning to familiar items sets up preparatory processes that affect change detection in familiar sound sequences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16269107     DOI: 10.1162/089892905774589262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  20 in total

1.  You had me at "Hello": Rapid extraction of dialect information from spoken words.

Authors:  Mathias Scharinger; Philip J Monahan; William J Idsardi
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Selective attention to pitch amid conflicting auditory information: context-coding and filtering strategies.

Authors:  Blas Espinoza-Varas; Hyunsook Jang
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-07-17

3.  Referent's Lexical Frequency Predicts Mismatch Negativity Responses to New Words Following Semantic Training.

Authors:  Aleksander A Aleksandrov; Kristina S Memetova; Lyudmila N Stankevich; Veronika M Knyazeva; Yury Shtyrov
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2020-04

4.  Happy you, happy me: expressive changes on a stranger's voice recruit faster implicit processes than self-produced expressions.

Authors:  Laura Rachman; Stéphanie Dubal; Jean-Julien Aucouturier
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Strength of word-specific neural memory traces assessed electrophysiologically.

Authors:  Alexander A Alexandrov; Daria O Boricheva; Friedemann Pulvermüller; Yury Shtyrov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Brain potentials to sexually suggestive whistles show meaning modulates the mismatch negativity.

Authors:  Jason Frangos; Walter Ritter; David Friedman
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 1.837

7.  Is my voice just a familiar voice? An electrophysiological study.

Authors:  Jérôme Graux; Marie Gomot; Sylvie Roux; Frédérique Bonnet-Brilhault; Nicole Bruneau
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  Auditory sensitivity exhibits sexual dimorphism and seasonal plasticity in music frogs.

Authors:  Ping Yang; Fei Xue; Jianguo Cui; Steven E Brauth; Yezhong Tang; Guangzhan Fang
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  A sparse neural code for some speech sounds but not for others.

Authors:  Mathias Scharinger; Alexandra Bendixen; Nelson J Trujillo-Barreto; Jonas Obleser
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A beamformer analysis of MEG data reveals frontal generators of the musically elicited mismatch negativity.

Authors:  Claudia Lappe; Olaf Steinsträter; Christo Pantev
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.