Literature DB >> 3663795

Event-related brain potentials and the perception of a phonetic continuum.

O Aaltonen1, P Niemi, T Nyrke, M Tuhkanen.   

Abstract

Competing predictions concerning phoneme discrimination were tested by means of event-related potentials. In research on speech perception, one tradition stems from the physiology of the auditory system whereas another emphasizes categorical perception which involves a marked psychological component. The stimuli were the end points of the Finnish (i)-(y) continuum together with the intermediate boundary sound. Two of these stimuli were presented in each block of trials. One (the 'standard') had a high probability while the other (the 'deviant') was rare. The so-called mismatch negativity (MMN) component of the ERP in response to deviant stimuli showed a large amplitude and short latency when these two stimuli were pure vowels (i) and (y). When the boundary stimulus and one of the pure vowels comprised the stimulus pair, a smaller and more delayed MMN occurred. This result may be taken as support that the discrimination occurs at a basic physiological level. On the other hand, cognitive perception was reflected in the different latencies of the P3 component to (i) and (y). In sum, the results lend support to multilevel hybrid models in the explanation of vowel perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3663795     DOI: 10.1016/0301-0511(87)90002-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychol        ISSN: 0301-0511            Impact factor:   3.251


  17 in total

1.  Mismatch negativity to tonal contours suggests preattentive perception of prosodic content.

Authors:  David I Leitman; Pejman Sehatpour; Marina Shpaner; John J Foxe; Daniel C Javitt
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 3.978

2.  Speech perception among school-aged skilled and less skilled readers.

Authors:  Ratree P Wayland; Erin Eckhouse; Linda Lombardino; Rosalyn Roberts
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2010-12

Review 3.  Generators of electrical and magnetic mismatch responses in humans.

Authors:  R Näätänen; K Alho
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 4.  The five myths of MMN: redefining how to use MMN in basic and clinical research.

Authors:  E S Sussman; S Chen; J Sussman-Fort; E Dinces
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 3.020

5.  Perception of American English vowels by sequential Spanish-English bilinguals.

Authors:  Paula B García; Karen Froud
Journal:  Biling (Camb Engl)       Date:  2016-09-13

6.  Brain potentials to sexually suggestive whistles show meaning modulates the mismatch negativity.

Authors:  Jason Frangos; Walter Ritter; David Friedman
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 1.837

7.  Finding the missing stimulus mismatch negativity (MMN): emitted MMN to violations of an auditory gestalt.

Authors:  Dean F Salisbury
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Comparison of time-frequency responses and the event-related potential to auditory speech stimuli in human cortex.

Authors:  Erik Edwards; Maryam Soltani; Won Kim; Sarang S Dalal; Srikantan S Nagarajan; Mitchel S Berger; Robert T Knight
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 9.  Magnetoencephalography Research in Pediatric Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Heather L Green; J Christopher Edgar; Junko Matsuzaki; Timothy P L Roberts
Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 2.264

10.  Oscillation encoding of individual differences in speech perception.

Authors:  Yu Jin; Begoña Díaz; Marc Colomer; Núria Sebastián-Gallés
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.