Literature DB >> 23686302

Discrimination of personally significant from nonsignificant sounds: a training study.

Anja Roye1, Thomas Jacobsen, Erich Schröger.   

Abstract

Discriminating personally significant from nonsignificant sounds is of high behavioral relevance and appears to be performed effortlessly outside of the focus of attention. Although there is no doubt that we automatically monitor our auditory environment for unexpected, and hence potentially significant, events, the characteristics of detection mechanisms based on individual memory schemata have been far less explored. The experiments in the present study were designed to measure event-related potentials (ERPs) sensitive to the discrimination of personally significant and nonsignificant nonlinguistic sounds. Participants were presented with random sequences of acoustically variable sounds, one of which was associated with personal significance for each of the participants. In Experiment 1, each participant's own mobile SMS ringtone served as his or her significant sound. In Experiment 2, a nonsignificant sound was instead trained to become personally significant to each participant over a period of one month. ERPs revealed differential processing of personally significant and nonsignificant sounds from about 200 ms after stimulus onset, even when the sounds were task-irrelevant. We propose the existence of a mechanism for the detection of significant sounds that does not rely on the detection of acoustic deviation. From a comparison of the results from our active- and passive-listening conditions, this discriminative process based on individual memory schemata seems to be obligatory, whereas the impact of individual memory schemata on further stages of auditory processing may require top-down guidance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23686302     DOI: 10.3758/s13415-013-0173-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.526


  58 in total

1.  Familiarity affects the processing of task-irrelevant auditory deviance.

Authors:  Thomas Jacobsen; Erich Schröger; István Winkler; János Horváth
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Neural mechanisms involved in the detection of our first name: a combined ERPs and PET study.

Authors:  Fabien Perrin; Pierre Maquet; Philippe Peigneux; Perrine Ruby; Christian Degueldre; Evelyne Balteau; Guy Del Fiore; Gustave Moonen; André Luxen; Steven Laureys
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Neurophysiological correlates of subjective significance.

Authors:  E Ofek; H Pratt
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  What's that sound? Matches with auditory long-term memory induce gamma activity in human EEG.

Authors:  Daniel Lenz; Jeanette Schadow; Stefanie Thaerig; Niko A Busch; Christoph S Herrmann
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 2.997

5.  Event-related potential study to aversive auditory stimuli.

Authors:  István Czigler; Trevor J Cox; Kinga Gyimesi; János Horváth
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2007-05-06       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  The rapid extraction of gist-early neural correlates of high-level visual processing.

Authors:  Frank Oppermann; Uwe Hassler; Jörg D Jescheniak; Thomas Gruber
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Automatic detection of lexical change: an auditory event-related potential study.

Authors:  Alexandra Muller-Gass; Anja Roye; Ursula Kirmse; Katja Saupe; Thomas Jacobsen; Erich Schröger
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2007-10-29       Impact factor: 1.837

8.  A triarchic model of P300 amplitude.

Authors:  R Johnson
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  The human amygdala is involved in general behavioral relevance detection: evidence from an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging Go-NoGo task.

Authors:  O T Ousdal; J Jensen; A Server; A R Hariri; P H Nakstad; O A Andreassen
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 3.590

10.  Explicit attention interferes with selective emotion processing in human extrastriate cortex.

Authors:  Harald T Schupp; Jessica Stockburger; Florian Bublatzky; Markus Junghöfer; Almut I Weike; Alfons O Hamm
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 3.288

View more
  2 in total

1.  Aging increases distraction by auditory oddballs in visual, but not auditory tasks.

Authors:  Alicia Leiva; Fabrice B R Parmentier; Pilar Andrés
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-05-23

2.  Email Overload? Brain and Behavioral Responses to Common Messaging Alerts Are Heightened for Email Alerts and Are Associated With Job Involvement.

Authors:  Maria Uther; Michelle Cleveland; Rhiannon Jones
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-07-31
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.