Literature DB >> 16050095

Rapid evolutionary escape by large populations from local fitness peaks is likely in nature.

Daniel M Weinreich1, Lin Chao.   

Abstract

Fitness interactions between loci in the genome, or epistasis, can result in mutations that are individually deleterious but jointly beneficial. Such epistasis gives rise to multiple peaks on the genotypic fitness landscape. The problem of evolutionary escape from such local peaks has been a central problem of evolutionary genetics for at least 75 years. Much attention has focused on models of small populations, in which the sequential fixation of valley genotypes carrying individually deleterious mutations operates most quickly owing to genetic drift. However, valley genotypes can also be subject to mutation while transiently segregating, giving rise to copies of the high fitness escape genotype carrying the jointly beneficial mutations. In the absence of genetic recombination, these mutations may then fix simultaneously. The time for this process declines sharply with increasing population size, and it eventually comes to dominate evolutionary behavior. Here we develop an analytic expression for N(crit), the critical population size that defines the boundary between these regimes, which shows that both are likely to operate in nature. Frequent recombination may disrupt high-fitness escape genotypes produced in populations larger than N(crit) before they reach fixation, defining a third regime whose rate again slows with increasing population size. We develop a novel expression for this critical recombination rate, which shows that in large populations the simultaneous fixation of mutations that are beneficial only jointly is unlikely to be disrupted by genetic recombination if their map distance is on the order of the size of single genes. Thus, counterintuitively, mass selection alone offers a biologically realistic resolution to the problem of evolutionary escape from local fitness peaks in natural populations.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16050095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  87 in total

Review 1.  The role of robustness in phenotypic adaptation and innovation.

Authors:  Andreas Wagner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Environmental change exposes beneficial epistatic interactions in a catalytic RNA.

Authors:  Eric J Hayden; Andreas Wagner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Scaling expectations for the time to establishment of complex adaptations.

Authors:  Michael Lynch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The rate of establishment of complex adaptations.

Authors:  Michael Lynch; Adam Abegg
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  Mutational effects and population dynamics during viral adaptation challenge current models.

Authors:  Craig R Miller; Paul Joyce; Holly A Wichman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Bistability in two-locus models with selection, mutation, and recombination.

Authors:  Su-Chan Park; Joachim Krug
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 2.259

7.  Breaking evolutionary constraint with a tradeoff ratchet.

Authors:  Marjon G J de Vos; Alexandre Dawid; Vanda Sunderlikova; Sander J Tans
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The rank ordering of genotypic fitness values predicts genetic constraint on natural selection on landscapes lacking sign epistasis.

Authors:  Daniel M Weinreich
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Deterministic and stochastic regimes of asexual evolution on rugged fitness landscapes.

Authors:  Kavita Jain; Joachim Krug
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-12-18       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Sex linkage, sex-specific selection, and the role of recombination in the evolution of sexually dimorphic gene expression.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 3.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.