Literature DB >> 16079241

The rank ordering of genotypic fitness values predicts genetic constraint on natural selection on landscapes lacking sign epistasis.

Daniel M Weinreich1.   

Abstract

Sewall Wright's genotypic fitness landscape makes explicit one mechanism by which epistasis for fitness can constrain evolution by natural selection. Wright distinguished between landscapes possessing multiple fitness peaks and those with only a single peak and emphasized that the former class imposes substantially greater constraint on natural selection. Here I present novel formalism that more finely partitions the universe of possible fitness landscapes on the basis of the rank ordering of their genotypic fitness values. In this report I focus on fitness landscapes lacking sign epistasis (i.e., landscapes that lack mutations the sign of whose fitness effect varies epistatically), which constitute a subset of Wright's single peaked landscapes. More than one fitness rank ordering lacking sign epistasis exists for L > 2 (where L is the number of interacting loci), and I find that a highly statistically significant effect exists between landscape membership in fitness rank-ordering partition and two different proxies for genetic constraint, even within this subset of landscapes. This statistical association is robust to population size, permitting general inferences about some of the characteristics of fitness rank orderings responsible for genetic constraint on natural selection.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16079241      PMCID: PMC1456840          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.104.036830

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  28 in total

1.  On the probability of fixation of mutant genes in a population.

Authors:  M KIMURA
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1962-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Evolution by small steps and rugged landscapes in the RNA virus phi6.

Authors:  C L Burch; L Chao
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Evolvability.

Authors:  M Kirschner; J Gerhart
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-07-21       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Synonymous and nonsynonymous rate variation in nuclear genes of mammals.

Authors:  Z Yang; R Nielsen
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Comparing patterns of nucleotide substitution rates among chloroplast loci using the relative ratio test.

Authors:  S V Muse; B S Gaut
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The structures of cytochrome c and the rates of molecular evolution.

Authors:  R E Dickerson
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1971       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  Evolutionary rate at the molecular level.

Authors:  M Kimura
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1968-02-17       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  'Haldane's dilemma' and the rate of evolution.

Authors:  P A Moran
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1970-01       Impact factor: 1.670

9.  The rate of molecular evolution considered from the standpoint of population genetics.

Authors:  M Kimura
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1969-08       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  The molecular clock revisited: the rate of synonymous vs. replacement change in Drosophila.

Authors:  L W Zeng; J M Comeron; B Chen; M Kreitman
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.082

View more
  12 in total

1.  Magnitude and sign epistasis among deleterious mutations in a positive-sense plant RNA virus.

Authors:  J Lalić; S F Elena
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  The fastest evolutionary trajectory.

Authors:  Arne Traulsen; Yoh Iwasa; Martin A Nowak
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2007-08-28       Impact factor: 2.691

3.  Long-term evolution on complex fitness landscapes when mutation is weak.

Authors:  David M McCandlish
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Genetic background affects epistatic interactions between two beneficial mutations.

Authors:  Yinhua Wang; Carolina Díaz Arenas; Daniel M Stoebel; Tim F Cooper
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  The pace of evolution across fitness valleys.

Authors:  Chaitanya S Gokhale; Yoh Iwasa; Martin A Nowak; Arne Traulsen
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 2.691

6.  Environmental dependence of genetic constraint.

Authors:  Marjon G J de Vos; Frank J Poelwijk; Nico Battich; Joseph D T Ndika; Sander J Tans
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 5.917

7.  Can parallel mutation and neutral genome selection explain Eastern African M1 consensus HVS-I motifs in Indian M haplogroups.

Authors:  Clyde Winters
Journal:  Indian J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-09

8.  Genetically integrated traits and rugged adaptive landscapes in digital organisms.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Ostrowski; Charles Ofria; Richard E Lenski
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Diminishing-returns epistasis among random beneficial mutations in a multicellular fungus.

Authors:  Sijmen Schoustra; Sungmin Hwang; Joachim Krug; J Arjan G M de Visser
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  The environment affects epistatic interactions to alter the topology of an empirical fitness landscape.

Authors:  Kenneth M Flynn; Tim F Cooper; Francisco B-G Moore; Vaughn S Cooper
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.