Literature DB >> 7621365

Representation of hand position prior to movement and motor variability.

M Desmurget1, Y Rossetti, C Prablanc, G E Stelmach, M Jeannerod.   

Abstract

Pointing accuracy of six human subjects was measured in two blocked conditions where the hand was either never visible (T: target only) or only visible in static position prior to movement onset (H+T: hand+target). It was shown in condition H+T that, viewing the hand prior to movement greatly decreased end-point variability compared with condition T. This effect was associated with a significant modification of the movement kinematics: the H+T condition induced a shortened acceleration phase with a corresponding lengthened deceleration phase, compared with the T condition. These results led us to the hypothesis that viewing the hand prior to movement onset allowed a decrease of pointing variability through a feedback process. This hypothesis was further tested by turning the target off during the deceleration phase of the movement at half peak velocity. It was shown that turning the target off had no effect upon the T condition but induced a significant increase of pointing variability in the H+T condition. This result suggests that vision of the static hand enhances the proprioceptive localization of the limb and allows for a better visual to kinesthesic feedback.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7621365     DOI: 10.1139/y95-037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Physiol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0008-4212            Impact factor:   2.273


  27 in total

1.  Adaptation of gaze anchoring through practice in young and older adults.

Authors:  Miya K Rand; George E Stelmach
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  On-line vs. off-line utilization of peripheral visual afferent information to ensure spatial accuracy of goal-directed movements.

Authors:  Patrick Bédard; Luc Proteau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-03-17       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Visual afferent information dominates other sources of afferent information during mixed practice of a video-aiming task.

Authors:  Luc Proteau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Is proprioception calibrated during visually guided movements?

Authors:  Pierre-Michel Bernier; Romeo Chua; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The type of visual information mediates eye and hand movement bias when aiming to a Müller-Lyer illusion.

Authors:  Ann Lavrysen; Werner F Helsen; Digby Elliott; Martinus J Buekers; Peter Feys; Elke Heremans
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The effect of target modality on visual and proprioceptive contributions to the control of movement distance.

Authors:  Fabrice R Sarlegna; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Contributions of vision-proprioception interactions to the estimation of time-varying hand and target locations.

Authors:  Hideyuki Tanaka; Charles Worringham; Graham Kerr
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-25       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Learning a multi-joint throwing task: a morphometric analysis of skill development.

Authors:  Ya-Ching Hung; T R Kaminski; Julie Fineman; Jane Monroe; A M Gentile
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Development of kinesthetic-motor and auditory-motor representations in school-aged children.

Authors:  Florian A Kagerer; Jane E Clark
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The weight of representing the body: addressing the potentially indefinite number of body representations in healthy individuals.

Authors:  Marjolein P M Kammers; Joris Mulder; Frédérique de Vignemont; H Chris Dijkerman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.