Literature DB >> 9169355

Histomorphometric assessment of bone mass, structure, and remodeling: a comparison between healthy black and white premenopausal women.

M Parisien1, F Cosman, D Morgan, M Schnitzer, X Liang, J Nieves, L Forese, M Luckey, D Meier, V Shen, R Lindsay, D W Dempster.   

Abstract

While noninvasive studies of bone mass and turnover in blacks and whites abound, histologic evaluations are very rare. We have performed a comparative bone histomorphometric study of iliac biopsies from 55 healthy, premenopausal women including 21 blacks (mean age 33.4 + 1.2 years) and 34 whites (mean age 32.5 + 0.8 years) of comparable age, weight, body composition, education, and lifestyle. Biochemical indices of mineral metabolism: parathyroid hormone, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, serum ionized calcium, serum phosphorus, and urinary calcium/creatinine were measured in the fasting state. Blacks had lower 25-hydroxyvitamin D (315 +/- 3.36 vs. 63.21 +/- 3.79 nmol/l, p = 0.0001). Histomorphometric indices of bone volume, structure, and connectivity were not different between groups. The following indices of bone remodeling were also similar in both groups: eroded perimeter, osteoid width, mineralizing perimeter, tissue-based bone formation rate, osteoid maturation time, active formation period, and activation frequency. However, osteoid perimeter (black [B] = 15.85 +/- 1.30 vs. white [W] = 9.49 +/- 0.70%, p = 0.0002), osteoid area (B = 2.55 +/- 0.32 vs. W = 1.39 +/- 0.12%, p = 0.003), single-labeled perimeter (B = 5.46 +/- 0.54 vs. W = 4.04 +/- 0.33%, p = 0.03), mineralization lag time (B = 38.18 +/- 4.04 vs. W = 21.83 +/- 1.60 days, p < 0.009), and total formation period (B = 148.15 +/- 19.70 vs. W = 84.04 +/- 7.62 days, p = 0.0056) were higher in blacks than in whites. The quiescent perimeter (B = 76.91 +/- 1.40 vs. W = 84.25 +/- 0.91%, p = 0.0001), mineral apposition rate (B = 0.70 +/- 0.02 vs. W = 0.75 +/- 0.02 micron/day, p = 0.066), mineralizing osteoid perimeter (B = 0.49 +/- 0.04 vs. W = 0.75 +/- 0.04%, p = 0.0001) and adjusted apposition rate (B = 0.35 +/- 0.04 vs. W = 0.58 +/- 0.04 micron3/micron2/day, p = 0.0001) were all lower in blacks than in whites. These results indicate that there are no differences in bone volume, microstructure, or turnover between black and white premenopausal women. However, there are significant differences in the mechanism of bone formation between the two groups, with a lower rate of mineralized matrix apposition within each remodeling unit and a longer total formation period in blacks than in whites. The differences appear to the result of more frequent and/or longer inactive periods in the life span of the bone formation units in blacks. These differences may allow a greater overall deposition of bone mineral in black women and therefore help explain a higher bone mass and perhaps better bone quality in black than white women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9169355     DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.6.948

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  32 in total

1.  Bone matrix mineralization is preserved during early perimenopausal stage in healthy women: a paired biopsy study.

Authors:  B M Misof; P Roschger; S Blouin; R Recker; K Klaushofer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Trabecular bone histomorphometry in humans with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Laura A G Armas; Mohammed P Akhter; Andjela Drincic; Robert R Recker
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 3.  Sex and ethnic differences in bone architecture.

Authors:  Dorothy A Nelson; Mary S Megyesi
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.096

4.  Brazilian normal static bone histomorphometry: effects of age, sex, and race.

Authors:  Luciene M Dos Reis; João R Batalha; Daniel R Muñoz; Aurélio Borelli; Pedro H S Correa; Aluizio B Carvalho; Vanda Jorgetti
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Socioeconomic status, race, and bone turnover in the Midlife in the US Study.

Authors:  C J Crandall; D Miller-Martinez; G A Greendale; N Binkley; T E Seeman; A S Karlamangla
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Effects of vitamin D insufficiency on bone mineral density in African American men.

Authors:  N Akhter; B Sinnott; K Mahmood; S Rao; S Kukreja; E Barengolts
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-09-27       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  PTH(1-84) administration reverses abnormal bone-remodeling dynamics and structure in hypoparathyroidism.

Authors:  Mishaela R Rubin; David W Dempster; James Sliney; Hua Zhou; Thomas L Nickolas; Emily M Stein; Elzbieta Dworakowski; Maryann Dellabadia; Rebecca Ives; Donald J McMahon; Chiyuan Zhang; Shonni J Silverberg; Elizabeth Shane; Serge Cremers; John P Bilezikian
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Trabecular bone score (TBS) in postmenopausal African American women.

Authors:  J F Aloia; M Mikhail; G Usera; R Dhaliwal; S Islam
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-10-11       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Comparison of mineral quality and quantity in iliac crest biopsies from high- and low-turnover osteoporosis: an FT-IR microspectroscopic investigation.

Authors:  A L Boskey; E DiCarlo; E Paschalis; Paul West; Richard Mendelsohn
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-08-09       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Renal osteodystrophy in the first decade of the new millennium: analysis of 630 bone biopsies in black and white patients.

Authors:  Hartmut H Malluche; Hanna W Mawad; Marie-Claude Monier-Faugere
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 6.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.